-1

If a person is very evil some would say he is a devil.

Can anyone give me another word—devil sounds a bit strange to me.

  • 4
    There is no good synonym for devil. Devils are bad, remember? – Robusto Mar 26 '11 at 12:09
  • 1
    @Robusto: But surely, even devils have mommies who love them very much? – oosterwal Mar 26 '11 at 16:15
  • Hmm, fictional evil person... Skeletor? – Orbling Mar 26 '11 at 18:05
  • @Orbling Fictional characters are not interchangeable, not to mention that calling the devil 'fictional' is somewhat incendiary. – Aeon Akechi Nov 13 '16 at 4:33

10 Answers 10

4

Without knowing the context, it's hard to answer this.

Menace, villain, fiend, cad.

4

Personally, I'm partial to the term "hellion", but "troublemaker", "nogoodnik", "problem child", "rabble-rouser", "incendiary", and many other words already given are all good words.

  • By most people's lights, Hitler was a truly evil man, and they might thus have said he was a/the devil. Good as they are in other contexts, I don't think your words would be applied to Hitler. – FumbleFingers Nov 19 '11 at 1:55
  • 1
    If you've ever seen a video of Hitler giving a speech, I think you would have no trouble calling him an incendiary rabble-rouser. – Hellion Nov 19 '11 at 2:57
  • Ah, you got me with the most defendable one in the list! But in the broader historical context rabble-rousing isn't really what the man is usually remembered for, and it's not particularly indicative of what we mean when we say he was evil. – FumbleFingers Nov 19 '11 at 3:05
  • 1
    These words better describe Loki than Lucifer. – Phil N. Jan 30 '12 at 23:17
  • @PhilN. Very true. – Zoe May 24 '14 at 11:20
3

6 answers already and no one has suggested: Demon, Satan, Lucifer or even simply: "fallen".

  • ...Oops... typo – Cos Callis Jun 17 '11 at 22:34
3

Without more context, I quite like brute or beast; you can also go with monster, varmint, fiend, etc.

If you want to convey the meaning of mischievous, yet somewhat likeable, you could go with rascal, rogue, imp, or scamp.

  • +1 for monster, I think that is the best suggestion that people might use in normal speech. – Mr. Shiny and New 安宇 Nov 19 '11 at 2:59
2

Looking at what others have recommended, rapscallion may be appropriate.

2

http://www.synonym.com/synonyms/evil/

Sense 1: evil (vs. good):
atrocious, flagitious, grievous, monstrous, bad, black, dark, sinister, corruptive, perversive, pestiferous, demonic, diabolic, diabolical, fiendish, hellish, infernal, satanic, unholy, despicable, ugly, vile, slimy, unworthy, worthless, wretched, devilish, diabolic, diabolical, mephistophelian, mephistophelean, evil-minded

Also See: bad; immoral; offensive; unrighteous; wicked; wrong

Sense 2: evil, vicious, wicked (vs. virtuous)

Sense 3: malefic, malevolent, malign, evil, maleficent (vs. beneficent)

  • Nice reference, but it's missing some commas. – Callithumpian Mar 26 '11 at 11:49
0

All the words I thought of were already mentioned with the exception of:

  • Knave
  • Miscreant
  • Scoundrel
0

Let's not forget the ever popular "bounder".

"Evil incarnate" may work if you're looking for something particularly strong.

0

Whilst not really synonymous with devil, a contemporary word which implies the immorality and depraved nature of an evil person is reprobate.

0

Apart from @Christi's evil incarnate, most existing answers imply people more "naughty" than truly "evil". And in this increasingly secular age, words like Demon, Satan, Lucifer are a bit odd.

Ongoing secularisation, liberalism, advances in psychology, etc., mean the defining characteristic evil that OP wants included is becoming harder to pin down. But I suggest the best word is...

psychopath - a person with a personality disorder characterized by a tendency to commit antisocial and sometimes violent acts and a failure to feel guilt for such acts.

  • I understood that a psychopath is, precisely, amoral, where evil is immoral. And if you talk to people who have encountered both (senior policemen, in my case), I think they will say that 'evil people' are quite different from 'those unrestrained by guilt'. – TimLymington Nov 19 '11 at 11:34
  • @TimLymington: As implied by my second paragraph, it's difficult to identify any examples of "evil" that meet everyone's definition of a word which some would argue has no real-world referent anyway. I'm not a psychologist, but I don't believe psychopathy is a precisely-defined "disease" which always includes the symptom "never feels guilt". Nor do I think the more general antisocial personality disorder excludes such people, or includes special subcategories for those who do feel guilt. – FumbleFingers Nov 19 '11 at 13:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.