22
  1. My fish's native habitat is rice fields.

  2. My fish's native habitat are rice fields.

Which one is correct? I'm pretty sure it's the first, since 'is' modifies 'habitat,' but it still sounds weird...

6
  • Just to be picky about terminology, is agrees with habitat.
    – Kosmonaut
    Mar 24, 2011 at 15:51
  • 2
    Wait, do certain fish actually live in rice fields?! :)
    – Jimi Oke
    Mar 24, 2011 at 16:26
  • See also english.stackexchange.com/questions/17588/…
    – Colin Fine
    Mar 24, 2011 at 16:36
  • @Jimi, Yep. petfish.net/kb/entry/339. Got one the other day and naturally follows lots of research.
    – emragins
    Mar 24, 2011 at 17:08
  • I would probably say "My fish's native habitat is in rice fields." But I prefer an earlier answer: "Rice fields are …" Jan 8, 2015 at 20:53

2 Answers 2

22

It may sound weird, but it is still correct. Singular nouns take singular verbs. In this case, the singular noun is habitat. Thus, is is the correct form of the verb to be in this case.

My fish's native habitat is rice fields.

To make it sound more natural, you could reverse the order thus:

Rice fields are my fish's native habitat.

6
  • Right, the second version would be natural. Note that adding a bit more detail with an article also solves the problem: "My fish's native habitat is the rice fields of Viet Nam."
    – The Raven
    Mar 24, 2011 at 17:28
  • 1
    It sounds weirder still when you use a first-person pronoun as the predicate nominative and modify a singular subject with a prepositional phrase ending in a plural: The oldest of my siblings is I. Or perhaps A family of happy people is we. Actually, I'm not sure about that one.
    – JCooper
    Mar 24, 2011 at 17:37
  • 1
    @JCooper For some reason those aren't so weird sounding to me. I guess it has to do with a couple years of grammar intense German. It's also easier because those sentences can be reversed and are clearly correct, and we can also get into Yoda-speak: The oldest of my siblings, I am.
    – emragins
    Mar 25, 2011 at 16:18
  • Does it mean that when using is/are, it is simply the first subject that defines the number? (Or is the second "subject" not a subject, but an object?)
    – arik-so
    Jun 25, 2012 at 8:10
  • @arik-so: Indeed, it is the subject that determines the verb form you use. It does not matter whether the object is singular or plural.
    – Jimi Oke
    Jul 7, 2012 at 11:41
4

Please advise, but Grammar Girl opines that the problem here is 'false attraction to a predicate noun'. I excerpt the fundaments:

Although this problem may seem complicated, it’s really not. It’s as simple as this: the verb agrees with the subject (2)1, not the predicate noun. - See more at: Verbs sandwiched between singular and plural nouns - Quick & Dirty Tips

Dorothy, don’t pay attention to the man behind the curtain, meaning don’t be distracted by the predicate noun. One grammar source calls this problem “false attraction to a predicate noun” (3). - See more at Quick & Dirty Tips

1. The (2) and (3) refer to external references on p 2 of 2 of Grammar Girl's article.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.