5

Is

It was me that Mr. Jones thought could do it.

correct?

Is that required between thought and could?

  • 1
    It was I that Mr. Jones thought could do it. – Kris Jun 5 '14 at 11:06
  • ...being a cleft structure built from 'Mr. Jones thought [that] I could do it'. – Edwin Ashworth Jun 5 '14 at 11:08
  • Isn't it either "It's me that" or "It's I who"? – jules Jun 5 '14 at 11:34
  • 3
    This is definitely not one for ELL; there's a Ross Constraint involved. Tensed complement clauses are normally not islands, unless they're marked with complementizer that. Since the relative clause extracts I from the verb phrase Mr. Jones thought (that) I could do it, where it's the subject of a complement clause, it's grammatical if that is omitted between thought and could, but not if that is present, because extracting a constituent out of an island produces extreme ungrammaticality. – John Lawler Jun 5 '14 at 14:43
  • ... Although the claim that global warming is producing more islands is even more contentious. – Edwin Ashworth Jun 5 '14 at 15:22
2

I always thought only the references to inanimate objects use that or which, otherwise who should be used.

"It was me who Mr. Jones thought could do it." - sounds perfectly fine to me. ("Mr. Jones thought I could do it.")

P.S. I intended the text as a comment to an answer above, but cannot comment yet due to the reputation level.

1

With a few more changes I think this is even more natural:

I was the one who Mr. Jones thought could do it.

-1

In my experience, a sentence like "It was me thought he could do it" sounds unusual, but (contrary to @johnlawler's statement) not particularly ungrammatical - especially if the word "me" is stressed.

  • Of course, one could also say, "'Twas I ..." ;-) – Matt Gutting Jun 5 '14 at 16:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.