What is the difference in meaning between repress and quell?

Are they interchangeable?

closed as off-topic by Kris, choster, tchrist, user66974, anongoodnurse Jun 1 '14 at 21:21

  • This question does not appear to be about English language and usage within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • Not in most cases. – Edwin Ashworth May 31 '14 at 23:14
  • 3
    Inadequate background research effort. – Kris Jun 1 '14 at 6:20
  • @Kris Their definitions seem extremely similar: put an end to (a rebellion or other disorder), typically by the use of force. / subdue (someone or something) by force. – Vedaad Shakib Jun 1 '14 at 18:55

I would say that repress has more negative connotations than quell. One might "brutally repress an uprising", for example: it suggests that force (or similar severe methods) are used. "Quell" is more suggestive of gentle reassurance or reasoned argument: "the priest quelled their fears".

Linked to that, there's an implication that something "repressed" doesn't really go away; it's just no longer in the open. "Quell" suggests that issues have been smoothed over.

  • Good points, but there is an area of overlap (ie the words are synonyms). – Edwin Ashworth May 31 '14 at 23:11
  • @EdwinAshworth Indeed. – avid May 31 '14 at 23:12
  • 1
    Interesting reversal because the etymology is just the opposite. – Third News May 31 '14 at 23:30

Repress: "to check, restrain," ... "hold back, curb," figuratively "check, confine, restrain, refrain," ...- "back" (see re-) + premere "to push" A terms later associated with psychological repression, and arresting a rebellion -http://www.etymonline.com/

Whereas, quell was from the get go "to kill, murder, execute".

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.