The other day I used the term confab, and the person I was talking to (50-ish, smart) had never heard the term. I know it was a buzzword in the 1980's, and I was amazed that she had never heard of it and doubted it was even a real word.

In a sentence: "Today, my boss and I had a confab over the wording of the new policy procedures."

  • 2
    I don't recall confab at all - in my salad days it was always conflab. Not that it was ever common. 70s equivalent of "geeky slang", I'd say. Good riddance. May 30, 2014 at 21:08
  • 2
    Google Ngrams shows use peaking between about 1879 and 1924. May 30, 2014 at 21:10
  • 2
    It would seem that conflab is a variant of confab, perhaps importing the l from the source word.
    – Jon Hanna
    May 30, 2014 at 22:59
  • 2
    @WS2: OED says confab/conflab are definitely both short for confabulation. Originally, Talking together; a familiar talk or conversation; chat going back to 1450, but humorously A conference by 1845. I can only offer OP my sincerest contrafibularities on his attempt to resuscitate it. May 30, 2014 at 23:01
  • 2
    I can recall it being used in computer techie journals and the like to refer to a semi-formal conference. (This recollection is likely from the 80s or so -- haven't seen the word more recently that I can remember.)
    – Hot Licks
    Jul 18, 2018 at 1:27

4 Answers 4


The other day I used the term confab, and the person I was talking to (50-ish, smart) had never heard the term. I know it was a buzzword in the 1980's,

It would seem it had started to die out already by the 1980s, to judge from this, though it's more popular than the unabbreviated form:

enter image description here

and I was amazed that she had never heard of it and doubted it was even a real word.

The flip-side of the frequency illusion is that people start off thinking the information is new.

The flip-side of that flip-side is that this seems weird to those who are already cognisant of the "new" information. For example, some people call the frequency illusion "the Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon". That seems sensible to them, but not to me, because I already knew who the Baader-Meinhof Gang were.

  • I think you charted against the wrong "full form". I only ever knew it as a noun (as in "We need a conflab to discuss tactics before we get started"). If you chart against confabulation it seems the abbreviated form has been falling off for almost a century, while the full form continues to gain prevalence. May 30, 2014 at 21:34
  • @FumbleFingers good point. We can look for a bit more info again, for that matter.
    – Jon Hanna
    May 30, 2014 at 21:56
  • 6
    Note however that confabulation acquired a new, psychiatric/psychological meaning during the 20th century. I suspect it is this meaning that is responsible for the growth in usage, due to the rising social awareness of dementia and mental illness.
    – Neil W
    May 30, 2014 at 22:07
  • Nice extra info there @Neil
    – Jon Hanna
    May 30, 2014 at 22:18
  • 2
    @Neil Yes I have never heard 'confab' used and was unaware of it until tonight. (Conflab I know all about). But 'confabulation' is a word my son uses. He is a post-graduate student in neuroscience, and 'confabulations' are what his granddad (my father) suffered from, in the few years leading up to his recent death aged 99 and three quarters. It was a form of dementia which involved less a loss of memory than strange imaginings about reality, e.g that he had recently been attacked in the street by 25 people (whilst all the time lying peacefully in a hospital bed)
    – WS2
    May 30, 2014 at 22:50

It is fairly clear that both confab and conflab originate from "confabulation". They have identical meanings as an informal conversation/unstructured dialogue/impromptu meeting. "Confab" is clearly the original abbreviation and appears in significantly more works of reference than "conflab", which seems to be a later corruption of "confab" and has become the more used variation in recent years, possibly because of the additional connotation of "flab"-biness or looseness/informality of the conversation in question.

  • Maybe so, but it doesn't answer the question as to whether it is still used.
    – Chenmunka
    May 16, 2017 at 10:45

For many years, starting in at least the early Sixties, confab was used regularly (and correctly) by Hall of Fame baseball announcer Ernie Harwell to describe a small conference at the pitching mound. But Harwell retired about fifteen years ago (and is now dead), and I rarely hear any other announcer use the term even though it offers excellent economy of verbiage. When it is used, the word is often attributed to Harwell, as if it were a made-up word, which it is not.

  • 1
    An informative first answer, but on SE we really like some citation or link so we can corroborate or follow up answers. I suggest you search for "Ernie Harwell and confab" and edit your answer include a link to one of the web pages that come up.
    – David
    Jul 4, 2017 at 21:04

It's certainly used by my brother and me (he b.before, I after the war)(which tells you roughly how old we are! However, it was precisely because I was checking whether it was confab or conflab that I should use in a message to him that I found myself here this evening! I'm going to use the l-less version of the abbreviated form as that's what I remember from the late fifties - early sixties. Cheers, Harry

  • 1
    "Confab" is still in use, though it's rather rare these days.
    – tautophile
    Jul 6, 2018 at 1:31

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.