Why is trans fat always italicized on food labels, so that it says trans fat? Is it just due to convention, or is there an actual reason (like for emphasis)?


2 Answers 2


From my Organic Chemistry days, I remember that the isomers (compounds with the same chemical formula but different structures), for cis and trans, were italicized.

If you look on the Wikipedia page for cis-trans isomerism, it follows this convention, as every cis and every trans is italicized.

Cis is Latin for same side. A cis bond is one where the the substituent groups are both on the same side of the carbon-carbon double bond. Trans is Latin for across, meaning the groups are on opposite sides of the double bond.

I don't know why it started (maybe because it was a foreign word), but it's been done and repeated for so long that it is now conventional to do this. Indeed, it is wrong by IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry) standards to write it any other way (except in contexts where italics are not available; then underlining is necessary.)

  • Lol, based on your answer this question seems very (too?) science-y for english language and usage.
    – Kevin
    May 13, 2014 at 23:15
  • Actually, I'm fairly at home with science (I have degrees in Molecular Biology and Medicine). I was trying to explain it to a non-scientist! May 13, 2014 at 23:16

It is italicized based on the mistaken belief that there is a convention.

The ACS Style Guide is considered the authority for writing chemical names in English. On page 145 we see that cis and trans (and all other locants) only need to be italicized when hyphenated in a chemical name, e.g. cis- 4-Chloro-3-buten-2-one. This clarifies their role in the name. When free standing, the text can remain plain.

However, the older IUPAC Blue Book (1979), where all the official international rules for naming organic molecules are described, does italicize cis and trans as free-standing words.

These two books are generally consistent. The fact that they are not for this convention suggests that it doesn't really matter. But when you see trans italicized, the person who did it thought they were following a convention.

  • Page 145 of the ACS Style Guide? Please clarify in your answer. Nice job finding a really good source to answer this question. Jan 3, 2017 at 21:51
  • 2
    Done. I have both books in front of me and just checked this with a former member of IUPAC. Her take was that italics were used more in the past. In modern written language, there is a new emphasis on minimizing the use italics to situations when it is absolutely necessary, thus, the differences in the books.
    – J M
    Jan 3, 2017 at 22:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.