1

Can in the following sentence ...

'I know Christian would want to be here, but I'm here in his place.'

... 'I'm here in his place' be replaced with 'I stand here for him'?

I.e.: 'I know Christian would want to be here, but I stand here for him.'

I read that 'stand for' means 'To represent; symbolize,' and now I'm wondering whether it can be used in reference to a person.

I'm asking because it is unclear to me whether a person can 'represent' or 'symbolize' another person.

To me, 'to represent' or 'to symbolize' are more suitable to use for abstract things.

  • possible duplicate of Using 'stand for' in reference to acronyms – tchrist May 3 '14 at 20:41
  • 1
    With a human subject, stand for refers to political or other social opinions and symbols. Eisenhower stands for fair trade could be an election slogan. The metaphor is "standing (up) for X", as one does to vote, or to fight for some goal. Since non-human things don't actually stand, the symbolic sense is predominant -- Y stands for X (with nonhuman Y) means that Y is to be taken as a symbol or representative of X. – John Lawler May 3 '14 at 22:34
  • 1
    Actually, @tchrist, this is quite a different use of "stand for". – AmeliaBR May 4 '14 at 4:26
1

Yes, "stand for [someone]" can be used to mean "represent" or "be here in his place", but it is not a common construct, and is usually only used in situations where the representation is formal and legal.

E.g., a lawyer stands for a client, or a colleague may stand for a member of a board of directors during an important vote that the latter cannot attend in person.

In most other cases, a more natural/modern phrasing would be "stand in for" or "substitute for": "Elberich was sick, so I had to stand in for him at the presentation without any practice".

"Stand for" may also be used (but again, only rarely) in the sense of "support" or "stand beside", for example the witnesses at a wedding are said to "stand for" either the bride or groom.

In the specific case you're suggesting:

'I know Christian would want to be here, but I stand here for him.'

I would say that sounds perfectly natural, but maybe not in the sense you intend. I read that as "I stand here, for him". In other words, the "for him" is an adverbial phrase giving the reason why you are standing here, not part of a phrasal verb. In contrast,

'I know Christian would want to be here, but I stand for him here.'

would force the "stand for" interpretation (that you will be representing Christian / voting on his behalf within this event / meeting), but it sounds much more formal or stiff.

If the sense of representation is important to you, some other more common ways to express "I'm here in his place" are

  • I'm here on his behalf
  • I am representing him here
  • I am standing in for him
  • I am substituting for him

Note that the first two imply that you are acting under Christian's direction, while the latter to merely suggest that you're replacing him.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.