English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
Usually when discussing monetary amounts, people will say "That cost one hundred million dollars" or "one hundred million pounds".
But I have also seen it written as "that cost one hundred millions sterling". Former UK PM Gordon Brown also used to say millions not million when giving his budget updates.
Are there rules for this usage, or is it just a question of putting the plural in the right place?
The use of "n millions" as a plural noun is somewhat archaic, as evidenced by this Google Ngram comparison of "Two millions" vs. "Two million".
As the plot shows, "two millions" has long been the standard expression. However, starting around 1850, its usage declined while "two million" rose in popularity. Around 1920, "two million" became the new norm, and today "two millions" is rarely used, except by traditionalists like Gordon Brown.
Here is an excerpt from The Gentleman's Magazine dating from 1841, chronicling proceedings in the House of Commons:
He thought it would be requisite to make up the permanent revenue to fifty millions sterling per annum. … There was now an aggregate deficiency of five millions, and a calculated deficiency of two millions more for the year to come.
In fact, million was once treated more as a noun than as a number. Here are some excerpts from Gales and Seaton's Register of Debates in Congress, 1836:
Congress often speaks of a million of dollars, a million of acres, etc. (p. 3992):
… and although our whole frontiers were embossed with fortifications, and garnished with a million of canon, our country would become the prey of the first invader who should guaranty a relief from such wrongs.
That goes for fractions as well (p. 3852):
Suppose you are to expend half a million of dollars in the construction and equipment of a ship of the line. What portion of the materials of that ship is furnished by the States of the East?
However, it is treated as a number when followed by less-significant digits (p. 3857):
In like manner, Georgia, by her compact of cession, entered into with the United States on the 2d of April, 1802, after expressing certain other stipulations, declares, "that all the lands ceded by this agreement to the United States shall, after satisfying the above-mentioned payment of one million two hundred and fifty thousand dollars to the State of Georgia, and the grants recognised by the previous conditions, be considered as a common fund for the use and benefit of the United States, Georgia included, and shall be faithfully disposed of for that purpose, and for no other use or pose whatever."
It is also singular when used as a hyphenated adjective (p. 4601):
And, sir, it is the same party, headed by the same leaders, whom I have stood by here and seen in days gone by, who defeated the three-million appropriation on the Ides of March…
Note that this archaic English treatment of million as a noun resembles modern French usage, which probably explains its origin:
Millier, million et milliard sont des noms et non des adjectifs. Ils ne font pas vraiment partie du nombre et laissent place à l'accord :
- quatre cents millions
Le pluriel commence à partir de 2. on écrit ainsi :
- 1,9 million
- 2 millions
Translation:
Millier (a word meaning "about a thousand"), million (106) and milliard (109) are nouns and not adjectives. They are not really part of the number and should be inflected:
- four hundred millions
The plural starts at 2. We write:
- 1.9 million
- 2 millions
Millions is used in sentences like the following.
Millions of TV viewers are following our show.
I've got millions of beer bottles in my cellar.
We make movies for the millions.
The use of millions in these sentences is similar to the use of hundreds.
In American English, I have never seen millions in phrases like 5 millions; million is always used, in the same way thousand is used in phrases like 10 thousand.
It is true that million can be used to mean a million dollars, but millions is used in sentences like "the author is set to make millions," not in sentences like "the author thought to get 6 millions."
I wonder whether millions sterling derives from a misunderstanding of sterling in pounds sterling as a postpositive adjective.
:-)
In my experience and understanding, one should use million when it is an adjective telling how many of something:
Use millions as a plural noun:
I couldn't find anything supporting phrases such as "one hundred millions sterling" but perhaps it is a British usage.
There's a quote here from an 1896 letter, describing the results of that year's American presidential election as "7 millions to 6 millions and a half." The letter was addressed to the British ambassador, so perhaps Kristina is right that it's a British usage - but the writer was an American. So this may have been an established usage.
