A similar question has been asked.
However, is it possible to give (general) differences in usage of fast, quickly, speedy and rapidly?
And with respect to the top answer: Are quick and fast absolutely interchangeable?
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
I do not think it is strictly possible to give guidelines to usage that are anything other than pedantic. I do, however, think that etymology provides some helpful clues to the more natural contexts of usage.
Quick is related to life and living things such that "quick as a rabbit" seems natural.
Fast has its relationship to strength and force that makes "fast cars" and "run a fast race" seem like a good fit.
Speed is related to success and goals giving "speed limit" and "speedy delivery" their purposeful ring.
Rapid has a hunger to it that makes it well suited to phrases like "consume at a rapid rate" or "rapidly overtaking."
Mixing these up produces some odd results: "Rapid rabbits" are comprehensible but more predatory that we are used to rabbits being. "Quickness limits" Nonsense. "Quick delivery?" Something else entirely. A baby has been born. Further evidence that "quick" wants to talk about life.
There are certainly no rules, just clues buried in the historical antecedents of the modern words. I would say try "quick" first for natural systems and living things and use "fast" as the go-to for machines, forces and acts of power. Rapid has a dark side. Speed is ambitious.
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?