One who creates is a creator. What is one who updates?

  • An updater?
  • An updator?

The last one seems more logical, but also wrong.

  • 3
    A natural selector. – Uticensis Mar 13 '11 at 4:36
  • 5
    @arex1337 Don't accept answers too quickly! You've gotten a nice answer, but I'm sure there might be a few people out there who have a little something to add, perhaps even one who can top the current highest-ranked answer. You see, if you accept too quickly, the software gives your question less visibility and it ultimately withers on the vine; not every question can be answered immediately. I'd advise waiting a day or two at least. – Uticensis Mar 13 '11 at 6:50
  • 1
  • Why does the second one seem more logical? – ShreevatsaR Mar 13 '11 at 12:03
  • 3
    While you're worrying about which spelling to use on theoretical grounds, you might like to bear in mind that usage has already established the -er spelling fairly convincingly. Google "software updater" and you get 1.7 million results compared to 29 thousand for "software updator". – Neil Coffey Mar 13 '11 at 15:33

According to Dr. Goodword's Language Blog,

Generally, -or is a Latin suffix and -er is the Germanic equivalent meaning, roughly, “one who Vs”, where V represents any verb. Words borrowed directly from Latin, then, tend to end with -or: governor, calculator, arbitrator, legislator, alternator. Words of Germanic origin (English is a Germanic language) generally take -er: runner, thinker, worker, joker.

However, two factors muddy the water. English borrowed many words from French in the Middle Ages and the French equivalent of -or and -er, is -eur. English generally reduced that suffix to -er, keeping it only in a few words borrowed late: amateur, restaurateur, raconteur [...]

[...] you need to know the etymologies of many of the verbs that -er and -or are added to, in order to know how to distribute them. You can be sure that verbs ending with -ize and -ify will take the suffix -er and that verbs ending on the suffix -ate will be suffixed with -or.

You may note that "update" ends with "-ate"; however, it is not a suffix, as it is in words like asphyxiate and elongate. According to dictionary.com, "update" is "up-" + "date", and "date" came to English via French, and therefore according to the information above should take "-er" as its suffix. (Indeed, dictionary.com lists "updater" in its set of related forms.)

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Good answer. BUT we don't need to be too philosophical about this: in practice, "(software) updater" with -er is reasonably well established. – Neil Coffey Mar 13 '11 at 15:29
  • 1
    Anyone who thinks a restaurant owner is a restauranteur weakens his authority on etymology. – Tim Lymington Jun 22 '12 at 20:11
  • 1
    Brilliant answer. – dalgard May 7 '15 at 0:09
  • A few words are used with both endings, as variants of each other. – Arm the good guys in America Nov 1 '17 at 1:27
  • ok "or" is a latin suffix...so? I don't understand, how does that explain the difference? – Charlie Parker Feb 5 '18 at 19:12

I would use creator for the person who creates a document/post/record and editor for someone who makes subsequent changes.

| improve this answer | |
  • I would personally use author instead of creator. – ogerard Apr 24 '11 at 22:47
  • @ogerard: and how about auther? Oh, sorry, it's way past 1.IV :) – quetzalcoatl Apr 9 '18 at 9:51

-er and -or are suffixes used to form nouns denoting a person, animal, or thing that performs a specified action or activity.

In the dictionaries I have, I don't find updater, nor updator.
If I were to choose, I would choose updater.

| improve this answer | |
  • 4
    I think they call him/her editor. – ngduc Mar 13 '11 at 4:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.