0

I am confused which phrase is more suitable to put in an official text that is comparing two phrases : 1) successful person 2) Ordinary or normal person.

| improve this question | | | | |
  • Wouldn't "average person" be a better choice here? – JSanchez Apr 2 '14 at 18:14
  • why not just 'people' – Oldcat Apr 2 '14 at 22:36
0

I personally think you shouldn't use any of the two options as they are not the opposite of a "successful person". But if you have to choose between the two, "ordinary people" is a better option. Using "normal person" might suggest that a "successful person" is abnormal.

| improve this answer | | | | |
1

Man in the street TFD

  1. the typical or ordinary person, esp as a hypothetical unit in statistics
    Origin: 1825–35

Synonyms: Joe Bloggs, Joe Blow, John Doe, common man, common person, commoner - a person who holds no title,

Personally, I would go for the average man in the street, the phrase is typically used to convey a person without exceptional abilities, talents or defects. A non-offensive term for the average member of the public.

Would you have done these things if you weren't successful, if you weren't rich? What if you were the average man in the street, with a poorly paid job, a small house, little money, two children, and debts.

| improve this answer | | | | |
0

Ordinary is (marginally) better than normal, as a normal person may be successful or unsuccessful, while an ordinary person is average, middle of the road, which implies neither very successful nor very unsuccessful. It seems to me, however, that neither of these words fill your need. Either contrast a "highly successful person" with an "ordinary person", or use the direct opposite: "unsuccessful person".

| improve this answer | | | | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.