2

I've often written sentences like these:

  1. The structure and linearity here is [are?]what is [are?] stifling creativity.
  2. Compare: The pencil and pen are in the room. [Where is seems wrong]
  3. The project is based on chapter information and book category, which is [are?] useless when guiding you toward the actual objectives.
  4. There is [are?] a table and chair in the room.
  5. Compare: A table and chair are in the room

Is the is appropriate in these sentences? Especially the first one; I don't quite get the rules at play here, so am only going by what sounds right.

marked as duplicate by Kristina Lopez, Edwin Ashworth, p.s.w.g, anongoodnurse, David M Mar 27 '14 at 6:43

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • In each case they probably should be "are". – outis nihil Mar 26 '14 at 17:01
  • 1: are, is; 2: are; 3: are; 4: are; 5: are. Rule of thumb: when in doubt, substitute a number plural: "There are two chairs (a table and a chair) in the room." Then it becomes obvious. – Robusto Mar 26 '14 at 17:13
  • 2
    We've had all this before, but finding all the different bits is taking me too long. There's (!) more than one question here. (1) are / is; is (2) are (3) is (conversational ellipsis of 'which situation') / are if individual listings are meant (4) There's / there are (Pullum says that "There's" is becoming all-purpose, like French "Il y a"). /// The unity of the referents of the nouns joined by 'and' informs choice: Bacon and eggs are both quite expensive at the corner shop. / Bacon and eggs is on the menu this morning. – Edwin Ashworth Mar 26 '14 at 17:46
  • 1
    Good sleuthing, @Kristina Lopez. I've used the 'bacon and eggs' example at least twice before. – Edwin Ashworth Mar 26 '14 at 17:58
1

Are is correct, unless the items make up a set. In your example: The structure and linearity [neither individually, but their single effect is from the presence of both together] here is stifling creativity. If either or both are doing the stifling: The structure and linearity are stifling creativity.

1

If someone asked "What is in the room?" and you responded "There's a table and chair," that's correct. Similarly, if you answered "There are a table and chair in the room" you wouldn't be wrong. In the first sentence, you're differentiating by type (there is one table and one chair/there is a table and there is a chair) and in the second, you're listing more than one object. Edwin mentions it in his comment, and here's a link so that you understand ellipsis, which is what allows you to say "there is a table and chair" instead of "there are a table and chair" if you wanted. The only problem is determining if there is ellipsis.

"There are" might sound wrong in that example because we recognize a table and chair as a set though. For example, people say "There is a knife, fork, and spoon missing from the table," instead of "There are a knife, fork, and spoon missing from the table." Neither of them is wrong, but when you think of the three utensils as a set, "is" suits the sentence better than "are". (A set of utensils is missing from the table.)

But if you were saying something like "There is a knife, fork, and nightstand in the bedroom," it sounds wrong (even though it isn't because of ellipsis) probably because we don't think of a knife, spoon, and nightstand as a set.

So if (like John says in his answer) structure and linearity as a set stifles creativity, then "the set (structure and linearity) is stifling creativity." I don't know why "what is" is in there, even if you didn't see them as a set, "structure and linearity are stifling creativity." The "what is" seems redundant. If it's in there, though, I don't see why it would change to "are"... it sounds like how teachers wanted you to answer questions when you were younger, where you use the question in the answer.

Q: What is stifling creativity?

A: Structure and linearity are what is stifling creativity.

But colloquially it seems like "There's" is used in place of "There are" and "There is" so... "There's" might be used in both cases.

In the case of which, if you can use "each of," "either of", "both of," "none of," and so forth in front of "which", you should probably just use "are". This is just going from personal experience, but I have always been corrected if I say "which is" and there's more than one object. I think ellipsis applies here too, but if I say "X and Y do this, which is Z," I usually get reprimanded and told to say "X and Y do this, which are Z." I was told to put each of/both of/none of in front of which and I'd see why that makes sense, but...

I have a knife and a spoon, which is made of silver. -> I have a knife and a spoon, each of which is made of silver.

I have a knife and a spoon, which are made of silver. -> I have a knife and a spoon, each of which are made of silver.

Both still seem right to me.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.