He called her, emailed her, texted her, tweeted her—all to no use.

Strictly speaking, I would need to write texted her and tweeted her, but I'm omitting and to convey a rhythm and sense of urgency. What do you call this kind of construction, and is it accepted grammar (at least for creative writing, if not in an academic context)?

  • possible duplicate of Omission of "and" in headlines – Cerberus_Reinstate_Monica Mar 11 '11 at 15:05
  • 3
    @Cerberus: That question is about telegraphese in headlines; this one is about prose. Similar, but definitely distinct. – Jon Purdy Mar 11 '11 at 18:42
  • @Jon: Okay, it is about a different context; but it does lead to similar answers. Perhaps more could be said about this, though I am not sure what... – Cerberus_Reinstate_Monica Mar 11 '11 at 19:40
  • "all to no use" doesn't sound right. Did you mean "all to no avail"? – Graham Borland Jul 11 '11 at 11:03
  • 2
    @GrahamBorland I think "all to no use" sounds fine, although "all to no avail" is the more common usage. – narx Oct 8 '11 at 22:36

It's a rhetorical device called asyndeton, and you can find its definition (as well as those of other rhetorical figures) here.

Asyndeton consists of omitting conjunctions between words, phrases, or clauses. In a list of items, asyndeton gives the effect of unpremeditated multiplicity, of an extemporaneous rather than a labored account: On his return he received medals, honors, treasures, titles, fame.

| improve this answer | |
  • 3
    Right. The device here conveys speed and urgency. Very appropriate to the subject matter in question. – The Raven Mar 11 '11 at 15:00
  • 2
    I love that not only is it a valid device, but it has a name. This site is great! – CodexArcanum Mar 11 '11 at 17:07
  • +1 for the link. I usually use the much more extensive list of literary terms available here. – 3nafish Dec 2 '12 at 4:20

I was taught that omitting the 'and' in such a situation was completely acceptable, especially in creative writing. The rhythm is much better without it. Leave it as is.

| improve this answer | |
  • Not only that, It seems it is acceptable in a New York Times editorial. "...his entire career makes a mockery of faith, family, tradition, virtue." nytimes.com/2017/07/08/opinion/sunday/… – H2ONaCl Jul 11 '17 at 1:32
  • 1
    'I came, I saw[,] and I conquered.' Not quite as punchy. – Edwin Ashworth Nov 9 '17 at 11:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.