Which is preferred below--1, 2 or 3? Are all versions technically correct? Which is your pick?

1. Mike, 25, Jimmy, 44, and Joshua, 49, were arrested on a charge of petit larceny.

2. Mike, 25; Jimmy, 44; and Joshua, 49, were arrested on a charge of petit larceny.

3. Mike (25), Jimmy (44), and Joshua (49) were arrested on a charge of petit larceny.

closed as off-topic by David M, TimLymington, Mari-Lou A, Bradd Szonye, choster Mar 3 '14 at 4:35

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. A list of these references can be found here: List of general references" – David M, TimLymington, Bradd Szonye
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


Although it's not likely to be mistaken in this particular example, #1 makes it difficult to tell whether Mike is 25, or if 25 is another item in the list.

#2 and #3 are perfectly correct, and very clear.

In this case, I personally prefer #3, though, it may not look as clean if you aren't dealing with ages:

Mike (son), Jimmy (father), Joshua (grandfather), were arrested [...]

In such an event, I would go with the commas and semicolons instead):

Mike, son; Jimmy, father; Joshua, grandfather; were arrested [...]

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.