1

I know many questions have been asked for ending a sentence with a preposition in this community. However none of that seems to be providing the answer which I am looking for in this scenario. Please consider following sentence.

Traditionally celebrities have been considered as one of the very few people who enjoy really luxurious lifestyles where many of us can only dream of.

Is it grammatically correct to end the sentence with the proposition 'of' ? or should I have used something like 'about'.

Pls consider that my English is not that great and I feel little awkward about this sentence I wrote. But unfortunately I can not find a reason. Have I made any other grammatical mistake ?

  • that we can dream of or of which we can dream. – Anonym Feb 28 '14 at 8:35
  • You should never use a preposition to end a sentence with. (There's absolutely nothing wrong with ending your sentence with "many of us can only dream of" -- other constructs to eliminate the trailing "of" result in awkward-sounding prose. But there are several other problems with your sentence -- far more severe even if you for some reason still consider the trailing "of" to be a problem.) – Hot Licks Feb 10 '16 at 18:09
  • Your primary question is a duplicate of When is it appropriate to end a sentence in a preposition? However, I'm not closing it as such since there are other issues with this particular sentence. – 200_success Feb 10 '16 at 18:25
-2

I think that, technically, you should say

Traditionally celebrities have been considered as one of the very few people who enjoy really luxurious lifestyles of which many of us can only dream.

To be honest though, people don't speak like that anymore. I would, however, write like that, particularly in a relatively formal setting, such as an essay, paper or publication.

  • 3
    Most people never did. It applies a Latin rule that isn't just irrelevant to English, but nonsensical (it exists in Latin precisely because Latin is otherwise much freer in word order, but "dream of which many us only can" isn't proper English just because the preposition is in the "right" place). Dryden took it as proof that he was a better writer than Johnson and Shakespeare, but it wasn't until the 18th C that the fetish for avoiding ending on prepositions just so you cold look down on others arrived. There is no point in history when all good writers followed this so-called "rule". – Jon Hanna Feb 28 '14 at 11:40
  • 1
    There is no technical rule such as the one quoted. That is, "technically", you may say either one. – John Lawler Feb 28 '14 at 17:16
  • Sadly, among pedants you sometimes have to avoid ending with a preposition because those pedants are, -- worse luck, -- your manager, parents-in-law, readers, customers, and so on. They're wrong, but often that remains your problem. In this case it's usually better to avoid the usually suggested circumlocution "of/in/at which/whom ...", which to the sane and hearty looks pedantic and tedious. For example, here you could instead say "... who enjoy a luxurious lifestyle which for many of us must remain a dream". – Dan Sheppard May 5 '14 at 0:32
3

The of at the end of your sentence seems absolutely no problem to me.

What bothers me more is the reference one of to multiple celebrities. I would change that to some of.

Where we can dream of gives me an itch as well, that we can dream of sounds much better.

Since you refer to a specific lifestyle, I would also add an article to it and make it singular.

Your sentence would become something like this:

Traditionally celebrities have been considered as some of the very few people who enjoy the really luxurious lifestyle that many of us can only dream of.

  • Thank you very much for the answer. I really appreciate it. – user67339 Feb 28 '14 at 10:19
1

Traditionally celebrities have been considered the very few people who enjoy really luxurious lifestyles that many of us can only dream of.

This is correct.

  • Your where was not correct (it sounds like Dutch, waar...van).

  • The preposition at the end was fine.

  • One of was incorrect, because you are not talking about one person.

  • As was also incorrect, because you consider someone smart, not *as smart.

  • I also think the present perfect have been is a bit odd: I would probably write are considered because it is a timeless fact. But it depends on context.

  • Lastly, I think a non-defining relative clause would be better than your that: I would write a comma followed by which instead.

Here is how I would probably write it myself:

Traditionally, celebrities are considered to be among the very few who enjoy true luxury, which many of us can only dream of.

  • Changing have been to are changes the meaning of the sentence. Have been gives me the idea something is changing now, and that change will be explained in the rest of the text. "Nowadays, however, by writing a mobile phone application, this luxury can be in reach for anyone who is willing to learn basic programming." – oerkelens Feb 28 '14 at 8:46
  • @oerkelens: As I said, it depends on context. But from what little context we have, it seems the intended meaning is a timeless fact, so I would change it to are. The OP might disagree. – Cerberus Feb 28 '14 at 16:32
0

It's linguistically correct; perhaps not "grammatically correct". It speaks to an "economy of speech", and is the normal way of speaking, if not writing. "He mentioned a celebrity I'd never heard of." "He enjoyed a lifestyle I've only dreamt of." "He enjoyed undreamt-of success." All of these seem to leave the preposition hanging without an object, but are perfectly common usages, and unlikely to be criticized.

  • 1
    Welcome to English Language and Usage. You need to provide some citation to back up your answer. – 200_success Feb 10 '16 at 18:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.