I was listening to the radio today, and someone said, "The couple came across a literal 'pot of gold.'" It made me think: how do you say the opposite of that? I'm looking for a statement or phrase that lets you know that an idiom is an idiom and not to be taken "literally."
Both are essentially the same, as you can see from many dictionaries using one to define the other. When I get home I'll consult a more accepted source than Google, but I'm sure they won't have much to add.
departing from a literal use of words; metaphorical.
characteristic of or relating to metaphor; figurative.
The opposite of 'literally' is literally... literally!
According to the Oxford dictionary, literally now has two definitions,
The traditional meaning:
In a literal manner or sense; exactly:
‘the driver took it literally when asked to go straight over the roundabout’
Or, the informal meaning:
Used for emphasis while not being literally true:
‘I have received literally thousands of letters’
So, depending on the context and emphasis, you could say the following:
The couple came across a literal 'pot of gold' when they bought their new house, and found it included a bucket of 16th Century silver coins.
And literally be grammatically and syntactically correct!
"Figurative", "Metaphorical", and "Proverbial" all spring to mind.
Figurative language is a general term describing anything in language that has a meaning other than its literal meaning--this is probably your best bet ifor a direct antonym of "literally." Note that the distinction between literal and figurative language exists within the field of language analysis independently of the contradictory dictionary definitions. Therefore, I am using "literally" here in its traditional meaning.
Metaphors are a specific figurative construct in which one entity is referred to as another entity in order to describe its properties. In your case, the couple found an actual pot of gold, but if they had stumbled across, say, an extremely valuable collection of ninth century Chinese porcelain, their find could still be described as a pot of gold to explain how valuable it was.
Proverbs are common sayings, often embodying a truth (eg. "A rolling stone gathers no moss"). I'm not sure if this usage is strictly correct, but I've heard it used on numerous occasions (for example, on Star Trek: The Next Generation, whenever the android Data used figurative language, he prefaced it with "proverbial" to explain that what he was about to say was not meant to be taken literally, e.g., "a proverbial needle in a haystack"). I believe that proverbial would be appropriate in your case, as "pot of gold" is a universally known saying within American English (possibly British English?), but I do not believe it would be appropriate if you were trying to establish the non-literalness of an arbitrary phrase with no cultural roots.
When you're using a metaphor, you state the non-literal as literal.
"The couple came across a literal 'pot of gold.'"
Would be better said, with emphasis on the metaphor itself:
"The couple came across a 'pot of gold.'"
And that my friends, is the opposite of literal.
Maybe it's because I'm a non-native speaker, but
The couple came across a 'pot of gold.'
Sounds like a metaphor to me already, because of the quotes, I'd not use any particular term to specify the fact that it's not to be taken literally.
Idiomatic might work, as that clearly states that what is being refered to is an idiom.
Virtual comes to mind here. The meaning is being such in essence or effect though not formally recognized or admitted. Source.
The couple came across a virtual pot of gold.
Semantically, equivalent to
The couple came across what was, in essence to them but not necessarily everyone else, a pot of gold.
Figurative while the literal opposite of literal, is a bit awkward in this type of usage. It's like hitting your reader over the head.
The couple came across a figurative pot of gold.
Semantically, it is the equivalent of
The couple came across a pot of gold that really wasn't a pot of gold at all.
Accurate, but not quite as useful in this construct.
I like metaphorical - a metaphor provides a way of understanding complex ideas via familiar idioms. Proverbial also works for the same reason.
I don't think virtual cuts it. It has connotations of 'almost/nearly/not quite', and I want my pot of gold - literal or metaphorical - to be a bit more certain than that, thank you. Obviously I think abstract is even worse in that regard.
I am unsure about figurative. It feels awkward to me: what is a figurative pot of gold? Is it some Platonic depiction of a real pot? An imaginary pot? An oxymoronic pot - a Dr Seussian Pot that is Not? ... The problem perhaps is that figurative covers too broad a range of rhetorical styles to be considered as a precise-enough opposite for literal.
As for the OED: its not the first time a word has been defined with "opposite" meanings - cleave is one that springs to mind. Even so, perhaps this time they took Humpty a bit too um ... literally?
'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.' 'The question is,' said Alice, 'whether you can make words mean so many different things.' 'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master — that's all.'
There are many good answers already offered. I'm going to offer my own definition, which is based more on nuance, than the meaning of the words themselves. In most instances the usage of "literal" in the example of "literal pot of gold":
Adds emphasis to the listener that the metaphor "pot of gold" is meant
- to be either not be an exaggeration or
- somehow a very close proximity to the literal truth
The opposite of "literal pot of gold" might be a "literal money trap"
In the US, if you want to express that the idea is not in fact literal if there might be confusion, the idiom we add is: "But not for real"
I'm partial to the word
abstract, but that may be my programmer showing... >.>
protected by tchrist♦ Feb 22 '15 at 0:02
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?