4

Example: rows 9 and 10 in the theatre are ??? rows.

Alternatively: rows 9 an 10 are ???-ly adjacent (while seats B and C are laterally adjacent).

There are words like subsequent, consecutive, etc., which have a somewhat temporal flavour, or at the very least hint at a sequential context (both are cognates of sequor, after all). But what's a good word choice for a strictly spatial context: an object behind/in front of another?

Clarification: I am a quasi-native speaker specifically curious as to why such a word seems so elusive, and equally as interested whether such a word exists in other languages. If there's no such thing, I'll accept that as an answer too.

  • And why not sequential? – bib Feb 19 '14 at 22:08
  • 2
    @bib I think the OP means that sequential implies a logic (numerical or other) – greener Feb 19 '14 at 22:11
  • What if there is no sequence? Maybe theatre rows are a bad example; say you only have two objects? – sebastian_k Feb 19 '14 at 22:13
  • Note also that posterior to and anterior to fit the bill perfectly, except that they're uni-directional. I'm looking for a word to specify the objects' relationship in space. – sebastian_k Feb 19 '14 at 22:15
  • 4
    Er, who says adjacent means side-by-side and not just 'next to one another' as theatre rows are? – Tim Lymington Feb 19 '14 at 22:18
1

I would say the rows are stacked or ordered front to back.

|improve this answer|||||
  • 1
    Stacked clearly lies along the vertical axis. Although depending on the theatre, that might work just fine to describe the rows. – sebastian_k Feb 21 '14 at 1:07
  • 1
    I will accept this answer because it will help me with future theatre reservations, although it is not 100% spot on. – sebastian_k Feb 21 '14 at 1:14
2

If this were a spreadsheet, you'd refer to that direction as columns as opposed to rows.

If you are talking about a theatre row, then you would just say the row behind.

If you are speaking of people, then you could use in line, or in a column to describe this positioning.

|improve this answer|||||
  • 1
    Those are all good alternatives in specific situations, but I was specifically interested whether a single word to describe this positioning exists. What if you are describing three theatre rows, not two? If everybody agrees that there is no such word, that's okay too. – sebastian_k Feb 20 '14 at 4:13
  • 1
    @sebastian_k Two rows behind. Three rows behind. I don't know that there is a one size fits all here. – David M Feb 20 '14 at 5:34
2

I believe one could describe the position of theatre seats behind and in front of a row as being parallel.

I found a math problem which uses exactly this expression

The seats in a theater are arranged in parallel rows that form a rectangular region. The number of seats in each row of the theater is 16 fewer than the number of rows. How many seats are in each row of a theater that has 1,161 seats

And if you click on the link you'll see an image of parallel rows of trees.

|improve this answer|||||
  • Tandem as suggested by one user, reminded me of parallel parking. – Mari-Lou A Feb 20 '14 at 6:10
  • Hm, I hadn't thought of this before. It's an interesting choice and will work in some situations, although it doesn't cover the neighbour-neighbour relationship (e.g. the front and the back row are just as parallel to each other as are rows 9 and 10) – sebastian_k Feb 21 '14 at 0:52
  • @sebastian_k Nothing is stopping you from saying: "the parallel front row" or "the parallel front row". And as for theatre row seats that are stacked that sounds as if the seats are placed one on top of the other. – Mari-Lou A Feb 21 '14 at 10:09
1

"back-to-back" looks like the best fit.

|improve this answer|||||
  • 2
    It'd be a rum theatre where the rows were back to back! Some sort of avant garde production, I expect. – peterG Feb 20 '14 at 3:31
  • 1
    Back-to-back is indeed the term that inspired this question: it didn't quite feel right as I was describing our theatre reservations to my friend. I often use the term in a temporal context (in place of "immediately after one another"), but in a spatial context it's hard to not imagine the rows facing in opposite directions. – sebastian_k Feb 20 '14 at 3:58
1

Appose/Apposite may indicate spatial proximity.

place (something) in proximity to or juxtaposition with something else. "the specimen was apposed to X-ray film"

(source: Google)

Also

from The London encyclopaedia (Vol 2)

|improve this answer|||||
  • 1
    I don't see the difference to adjacent: as it says in your scan, it means "near or side by side", which is specifically not what I was asking. – sebastian_k Feb 21 '14 at 0:46
1

I've heard tandem used when talking about parking spaces that are one in front of the other.

|improve this answer|||||
  • 1
    Interesting, thank you! (Although I don't think it fits the bill in the general case, as it really seems to be limited to one-behind-the-other parking space pairs specifically when one end is walled off.) – sebastian_k Feb 20 '14 at 4:02
0

Abutting should fit in this case. Juxtaposed may also work.

|improve this answer|||||
  • 2
    Abutting is an interesting choice, but I don't think it's any more specific than adjacent. Juxtaposed carries the notion that the objects were placed next to each other to achieve some effect (like contrasting them). – sebastian_k Feb 20 '14 at 3:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.