It's a common stereotype of Irish-English speakers that they end sentences with "at all, at all" as in

You want a drink at all, at all?

You have any money at all, at all?

My question is twofold -

  1. Do Irish-English speakers actually say this, or if they don't say it now, did they say it in the past?

  2. Where does the idiom come from?

  • 1
    It comes from Ireland, . . . naturally Feb 11, 2014 at 15:13
  • It's not "naturally" so. Some aspects of English as used in Irish such as crack (or the gaelicised spelling craic) in terms of good times, and press in terms of cupboards come from England; they just remained in Ireland after they'd died out there.
    – Jon Hanna
    Feb 11, 2014 at 17:27

5 Answers 5


To take your questions in reverse:

Where does the idiom come from?

As described here, in most English dialects at all stresses that you are considering a small amount, and in some Irish dialects it is used in two ways in questions:

  1. To emphasise puzzlement over the answer if the question is one of fact. This is an extension of the more widely-found meaning (e.g. "How did you do that, at all?" can be interpreted as implying "I don't know how you could do even a little part of what you did", hence emphasising your puzzlement).

  2. As a more general emphasis on any question, especially one of opinion. This stretches the meaning from the specific emphasis above to a more general emphasis. It can also serve as some added redundancy when the sentence is short, which is a verbal habit in quite a few dialects.

That answer was about questions, but the same also applies to statements in the inverse; at all emphasising "to the slightest extent" or else being generalised further to a more general emphasis—indeed the form in questions comes from the form in statements.

Now, there is also a tendency to double for emphasis in all forms of English that gets expressed in different ways. Even standard English would allow the doubling of some adverbs ("they were very very doubtful until he gave an example") and some adjectives ("big big" would be considered childish but certainly found while "great big" is equally redundant as while it uses different words, it uses them in synonymous senses) or redundant do which is semantically a doubling ("I do agree this isn't quite the same thing").

Hiberno-English is particularly fond of emphasis through redundancy, and it's not unheard of in Ulster-Scots either. Some of this comes from the way the reflexive would be used in Irish leading to a use of the reflexive for emphasis in English, some comes from the lack of a simple yes or no in Irish leading to either it not being used in Hiberno-English ("I am" instead of just "yes") or it being doubled with the standard yes, ("Yes, I am" or "I am, yes" instead of just "yes") which is truly redundant*, some from a different use of do-support for emphasis to standard English, ("I do be checking that every day.")†. None of these forms are originally emphatic, but having a knowledge of how they're redundant compared to the standard English equivalents meant that they're available for use for emphasis.

And then some grows from that; we've a form of English that has several features using redundancy for emphasis, and so we've a tendency to add more redundancy when we want to add emphasis, beyond that already found.

So, given the use of "at all" for emphasis, and given that tendency toward redundancy for emphasis, and given that doubling is found in all forms of English for emphasis, we end up with "at all, at all" for even more emphasis.

Do Irish-English speakers actually say this, or if they don't say it now, did they say it in the past?

Yes, and more so in the past.

Now, first it's worth considering that not all British people will say "Cor, blimey, Guv'nor!" nor all American people will say "dag nab it", but both of those expressions are stereotypical expressions of people from a particular background in a particular part of those countries that does get heard in real life.

Of the various expressions I give above, some I would use in all but the most formal registers (avoiding a plain "yes" or "no"), some I would never use, and some I'd only use quite consciously. Other Irish people from different areas would have a different set of Hibernicisms‡ and a different set of retentions of standard English that have since been lost (e.g. in much of England, they don't call presses, presses any more, having completely replaced the word with cupboard).

"At all, at all" is considered to be a bit stereotypical in much of the country, and so while you will definitely find some Irish people (especially older Irish people) using it as part of their everyday speech, you'll also find it used with a degree of irony, along with other "Oirish" phrases**.

Of course, use a phrase ironically often enough, and you end up just using it.

But that's about the balance I'd say "at all, at all" is at; some Irish people do say it, and some Irish people say it ironically.

*Once going through airport security I was asked if I had any electronics in my bag. I replied, "I don't, no". Unfortunately while any Irish person would be likely to interpret that as I said it, the security guy wasn't Irish and what they heard was "I don't know". This is not what you want a security guy hear you saying about your carry-on luggage.

†A stereotypical Hiberno-English turn of phrase is "I do be doing…", where it's not really particularly likely to be said over this use of do-support with any other verb††, but the double do makes it stand out more as strange to other English-speakers, hence it becoming a stereotype.

‡And for that matter, the dialect of my childhood also showed some Ulster-Scots influences, though I've lost at least some of them since.

***Oirish* being a slang term for stereotypical features of Irish culture, especially if they're not ever found in Ireland (e.g. most things involving leprechauns), are actually more a part of Irish-British or Irish-American culture if people falsely associate them with Ireland (e.g. the Irish-American fondness for corned beef or their feast-day "St. Patty's"), or are indeed found in Ireland, but not as much as stereotypes would suggest (ah, to be sure, to be sure, we do be having all manner o' funny things said at us that we don't be understandin' around the middle of March).

††Though I've only just realised something else about "I do be" which is that it is habitual be. I do be programming (I regularly program) but I am not programming (I am not currently programming). I only realised this feature of Hiberno-English "do be" when reading something about how AAVE similarly uses be in a habitual sense, "I be programming" etc.

  • 3
    There is also the similar near-identical redundant repetition in Irish that I speculated from in a similar question a while ago. Ar chor/scor ar bith is an extremely common phrase in Modern Irish. Feb 11, 2014 at 15:30
  • @JanusBahsJacquet almost certainly an influence, leading to our habit of using "at all" more often than other English-speakers and also with a slightly wider sense of meanings, and hence being part of what gets us to the point in my description above where we have some redundancies used for emphasis, and then when seeking further emphasis add further redundancies.
    – Jon Hanna
    Feb 11, 2014 at 15:35
  • @JonHanna If I understand your answer correctly, it would imply that the two examples I gave in my question aren't correct, because the "at all" is not being used for emphasis - something like "I haven't any money at all, at all" would be more correct. Do I have it right? Feb 11, 2014 at 18:03
  • @ChrisTaylor That last example sounds pretty realistic. Your second read to me as emphasis in response to hearing that someone was broke (as in, "are we saying almost no money, or not a penny?"). Now the first is just about believable if e.g. we'd been in a social situation where you would expect me to take a drink and I hadn't for some time. The less strong "You want a drink at all" sounds more likely, in the "even a little bit"; either because I might be leaving soon, or you don't know whether or not I drink. Ireland stereotypically has a strong drink culture, but this is combined with...
    – Jon Hanna
    Feb 11, 2014 at 18:19
  • ... a strong temperance movement throughout much of its history too. A culture that places a strong emphasis both upon drinking and upon not drinking means that etiquette around offering a drink would have to politely allow for refusal, making the "in the slightest" sense of "at all" appropriate. It would certainly sound a bit old-fashioned, but not strange.
    – Jon Hanna
    Feb 11, 2014 at 18:29

Reduplication is an alleged trait of Hiberno-English (Irish-English), eg. to be sure, to be sure..., strongly associated with stage-Irish.

The OED has citations of this use from 1375.

The usage in negative constructions has a similarly long history, where it means ‘to any degree’.

I've read the old joke goes that in Dublin a yellow line on the road means no parking at all, and a double yellow means no parking at all, at all.

  • 3
    A more general joke explains that as part of the general Irish approach to legality; other countries have "legal" and "illegal", or "legal", "misdemeanor" and "felony", but Ireland has "fine so", "ah, you're grand", "careful now" and "ah, now you're taking the piss". "Ah, you're grand" is for things you shouldn't really do, "careful now" is for things you shouldn't do at all, and "ah, now you're taking the piss" is for things you shouldn't do at all, at all.
    – Jon Hanna
    Feb 11, 2014 at 11:02

I'm a Hiberno-English speaker and the use of "at all, at all" is a lot more subtle than suggested by these sentences:

You want a drink at all, at all?

You have any money at all, at all?

Instead, this hypothetical question offers a good example of its usage:

What will become of her at all, at all?

The speaker is using the phrase "at all, at all" as a means of lamenting something that is worrying them.

The phrase is used in Ireland today.

Another example:

What are we goin' to do with him at all, at all.

I think the redundancy is used to express emotion rather than to emphasise. If I was to say this sentence, I would hold the "ah" in the first "at", with the remainder of the phrase expressed almost like a sigh.

Another nice example of Hiberno-English redundancy:

Shall we go so?

The word "so" here is used as a means of diplomacy, removing any notion that you're subtly suggesting "It's high time we be on our way!".


The OED describes it as now being ‘U.S. regional and Irish English’, meaning ‘In affirmative use: in every way; altogether, wholly; (later also) only, solely’. The earliest citation in this sense is from the fourteenth century.


It's like this, when you're driving down the road in Ireland and you see a single continuous white line in the middle of the road, that means you can't cross in the opposite lane 'at all'. If there is a double continuous white line in the middle of the road that means you can't cross in the opposite lane 'at all, at all'.

  • Yes, I first heard that joke over 50 years ago. But it doesn't answer the question.
    – Chenmunka
    May 15, 2015 at 9:01
  • @Chenmunka well it kinda does! But maybe Japser'd like to ellucidate for the person who asked the Q? May 15, 2015 at 10:48
  • reply below.... May 19, 2015 at 21:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.