Is one stronger than the other? More correct? Just curious, one of the many abstract things to pop into my head on the drive home today...


The biggest difference between the two is how many syllables it takes to say them:

It*is*n't vs Its*not

This obviously matters a whole lot for rhythm and rhyme.

Sometimes (though rarely) it is worth avoiding the harsh 's' sound from it's not due to microphones' tendency to accentuate the sssss.

But in terms of meaning there is no significant difference. Using "it is not" would sound a tad more formal due to the lack of contractions and the overt effort required to say it that way.

  • 2
    I tend to avoid "it's not" because it sounds too much like "it's snot" -- as in the old margarine commercial ... "You might think it's butter, but it's not!"
    – Dave Tweed
    Mar 30 '19 at 14:34

I would say that the only difference is that you can put emphasis on the word 'not' in the latter example (when spoken)

It's NOT good...

It would be more difficult to emphasise the word "isn't"

  • 4
    Your answer, it isn't good. ;)
    – z7sg Ѫ
    Mar 30 '11 at 11:23
  • 3
    I think you have a point here: keeping the word 'not' results in more emphasis on the negation.
    – clabacchio
    Oct 17 '13 at 11:24

They're very similar in meaning -- both are correct, both are contractions of "it is not", and both are fairly casual in tone. The differences are extremely slight, and easily negated in spoken speech by word emphasis.

Of course, contractions are often discouraged in formal, or technical writing.

Perhaps one might avoid "it's not" because it sounds a bit like "it snot". I can't think of any other reasons one might prefer one or the other.


They are identical, even in connotation.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.