I want to emphasize A and B. So I wrote: "A and B are needed to be highlighted."

I feel it is not natural. What would be better way in written English?

closed as off-topic by FumbleFingers, aedia λ, J.T. Grimes, choster, Avner Shahar-Kashtan Jan 4 '14 at 8:56

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. A list of these references can be found here: List of general references" – FumbleFingers, J.T. Grimes
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • could you give some more context. Are we talking about writing or speaking or just the message itself. – Emanuel Jan 3 '14 at 16:31
  • 2
    I think this level of question is better suited to English Language Learners. @Daebarkee - just replace the clumsy (and grammatically incorrect) are needed to be with must. – FumbleFingers Jan 3 '14 at 16:37
  • Belongs in English Language Learners. – Avner Shahar-Kashtan Jan 4 '14 at 8:56

Your sentence is incorrectly structured. You could say A and B need to be highlighted. That would make more sense.

  • Yes. When need takes an infinitive complement, it can't be passivized. – John Lawler Jan 3 '14 at 16:40
  • Here, A and B are not person. Some actions. Ex. Continuous exercise and money saving are needed to be highlighted. Do you think in this case, still, "need to be highlighted" is correct? – Daebarkee Jan 3 '14 at 16:41
  • 1
    @Daebarkee: yes – Jacobm001 Jan 3 '14 at 16:43
  • Or as in the Pittsburgh region, thanks to Scottish immigrants, it's OK to say, "A and B need highlighted"! That wording seems to emphasize the importance of A and B being highlighted, at least in speech. Formal writing is another matter. – rhetorician Jan 3 '14 at 16:44
  • 1
    @rhetorician: Really? That's... ugh... no. – Jacobm001 Jan 3 '14 at 17:16

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.