I'm a native Spanish speaker who's trying to grasp some of the subtleties of (American) English pronunciation. I think the sounds that give me the most trouble are the triplet of low back vowels: /ɑ/, /ʌ/ and /ɔ/. The word "gone" is especially tricky, because each time I hear it I hear something different:

  • Sometimes I think it's with a /ɔ/, as if it was "gawn". From my very limited experience, it would seem like this is more common in Southern accents.
  • Other times it sounds like a /ɑ/, the same vowel as in "pot".
  • The third option would be /ʌ/, like "gun", but I'm pretty sure this is not it.

Which one of these is it? Does it depend on the accent?

  • 4
    Both on and gone are pronounced either with /ɔ/ or /ɑ/, depending on the regional dialect. And they don't always rhyme. Dec 23, 2013 at 19:52
  • I doubt the usage is so well-known in the US, but many UK speakers reserve a special pronunciation of gone for facetious contexts like "Not lorst, but gorn before" Dec 23, 2013 at 22:18
  • @FumbleFingers Is that some sort of "intrusive r", or is that just one of your British "fake r" thingies? Anyway, I always thought that a gorn was some sort of Awful Green Thing from Outer Space.
    – tchrist
    Dec 24, 2013 at 19:13
  • @tchrist: I don't think it's an "intrusive r" - that's the one in, for example, loweR or upper, where I suppose everyone has to enunciate the first R because schwa followed by vowel is awkward. I don't what a British "fake r" is, though. All I can say is lots of dialectal speakers (incl. "Cockneys") will say gawn quite naturally - but in my experience, gorn is usually a deliberate affectation (particularly common in that "Muvva's lament" context I linked to, as popularised on Cream's "Disraeli Gears") Dec 25, 2013 at 17:33
  • @FumbleFingers I guess what I’m asking is what the IPA is. By "fake r" I mean a silent letter, one spelled but not said. Consider these various possible pronunciations of gone: [gən], [gɑn], [gɒn], [gɔn], [gɔɹn], [goɹn], and [gorn]. Do you mean one of those, and if so, which one in particular? If you don’t mean one of those, could you please show me what you do mean?
    – tchrist
    Dec 25, 2013 at 17:54

1 Answer 1


English vowels have a large amount of variation between accents and individual speakers. Even among speakers who pronounce cot and caught differently, gone and on may be pronounced either way. Gone and on do not belong to any lexical set, but the closest one for me is cloth.

So it’s generally pronounced /gɑn/, and that’s the pronunciation I would prefer if you’re learning American English. But as you have noticed, in some accents it’s /gɔn/ (as in gaunt). As Peter Shor says, it usually rhymes with on.

I think /gʌn/ is possible, but would analyse it as an unrounded version of the /gɔn/ pronunciation, perhaps Scottish or northern English, in which gun is likely to be pronounced /gʊn/. And as with any vowel, in unstressed position it can become /ə/. So /gən/ is also possible, albeit unlikely because gone is rarely unstressed. For example:

He’s gone out to the store.

  • I thought that in American English, gone and on didn't fit well into any lexical set. Dec 23, 2013 at 20:45
  • @PeterShor: I don’t know, you may be right. No counterexample came to mind is all.
    – Jon Purdy
    Dec 23, 2013 at 20:53
  • If you look at the Merriam-Webster dictionary, they give cloth the symbol ȯ, which means you should pronounce the same way you do caught (things in this lexical set are pronounced like caught in the U.S. and cot in the U.K.) However, they give the pronunciations: \ˈgȯn also ˈgän\ and \ˈȯn, ˈän\. Dec 23, 2013 at 21:04
  • 1
    The canonical test is the two names Dawn (female: /dɔn/) and Don (male: /dan/) in the U.S.A. People with the merger don't distinguish them in speech. The shift originated during the settlement of the West coast, and the original merger map includes the whole coast, narrowing down to a funnel that terminates around Iowa or so, on the Mississippi. But people move around a lot in the U.S, so it's all over the place. Dec 23, 2013 at 21:59
  • 2
    @tchrist: I can't write them in IPA; Merriam-Webster uses pronunciation symbols to represent lexical classes. That is, they say that the symbol /ȯ/ should be pronounced like /ɔ/ and /ä/ like /ɑ/ for people who distinguish caught and cot, and that these two symbols should be pronounced the same for those who merge them. So what Merriam-Webster is implying by using these symbols is that even among those people who distinguish between cot /kɑt/ and caught /kɔt/, on and gone can be pronounced either with /ɑ/ or /ɔ/. That would be much more complicated to convey with IPA. Dec 24, 2013 at 19:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.