0

I'm trying to figure out how best to write that I've been awarded for obtaining the second best (is it better to say highest?) grade|mark|score. I'm talking about the final grade|mark|score of a degree (not of a single exam), which is represented by a number instead of a letter.

So far I've been writing "Award for the second best mark", but not sure whether it's correct or may be improved.

5
  • British or American English? (Or neither?)
    – user28567
    Dec 20, 2013 at 11:40
  • @snailboat Suggestion for both would be nice.
    – user29020
    Dec 20, 2013 at 11:52
  • "the second highest grade|mark|score" -- best is not relevant here: "Award for the second highest mark"
    – Kris
    Dec 20, 2013 at 13:59
  • @Kris and what's your opinion about which word fits better?
    – user29020
    Dec 20, 2013 at 14:47
  • As a side note, pipes are not used in English like that. These should be forward slashes.
    – RegDwigнt
    Dec 20, 2013 at 18:07

3 Answers 3

1

"Awarded/Commended for obtaining the second highest mark."

0

Award for graduating second in my class.

0

I have to take a normative view here and propose that you consider the following:

If you got "the second best mark," you may want to familiarize yourself with the various ways academic success is measured at the macro level in order to select the appropriate equivalent for the person or group that is your target.

First there is the matter of the ordinal ranking which seems to imply to me that there is indeed someone ranked higher than you, and if this were the case then that person would be the valedictorian and you would be the salutatorian.

The second thing to that comes to mind is that there is the system of Latin honors typically labeled "cum laude, summa cum laude, and magna cum laude" or "highest honors, high honors, and honors." As far as I know they are typically offered at the undergraduate level upon completion of a program of study and appear to be based on some objective standard such such as crossing a designated overall GPA threshold and/or falling withing the top X percent for a particular grouping. This could yield the result that one year no one in the graduating class met the required GPA level for highest honors and that was an essential criteria that couldn't be salvaged by the addition of a relative criteria such as in the top 10%.

It is up to you to determine if "the second highest mark" is an term of art that has specific meaning in your academic system that goes beyond the plain meaning of the words and instead would more truthfully be represented by some sort of "plus-good" distinction analogous to the aforementioned Latin honors. I say this more to remind myself that when making an equivalent interpretation, always remember to present it on your bona fides in a way that makes sure there is no confusion that arises from it

The interesting thing is that these "honor designations" such as the Latin honor system is more of an enhancement to the degree and are structured to be presented as such. It is worth pointing out also that those whom they identify as the top two students are usually given more work as a result during graduation: Perhaps so everyone gets to witness the penalty for making everyone look bad!

These are some sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_honors http://www.utexas.edu/cola/student-affairs/Academic-Planning/Graduation/Honors.php

1
  • It's your first example. There is only one guy with a mark higher than mine.
    – user29020
    Dec 20, 2013 at 19:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.