# Is this that-clause for set comparison or a relative?

[i] It was lucky that Harry had tea with Hagrid to look forward to, because the Potions lesson turned out to be the worst thing that had happened to him so far.

–– Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone

[ii] a. Ed made the most mistakes of them all. b. It sold for the highest price ever paid for a Cezanne.

–– CGEL, p.1101

[ii] is called set comparison, for “one member is picked out as being at the top of the scale. In [ii] the set is identified by the NP them all: the comparison is between the members of this set with respect to how many mistakes they each made, with Ed ranked at the top of the scale. It is possible to omit the PP of them all, in which case the set being compared is identified contextually. In [iib] the comparison is between the prices paid for painting by Cezanne, and again one is picked out as being at the top of the scale - CGEL,1102”.

It seems like [i] is a kind of the set comparison, but I’m not sure for [i] has that-clause that could be understood as a relative one. Is the that-clause a set one or a relative?

• What does CGEL say about [i]? Dec 11, 2013 at 12:00
• @BarrieEngland, I've not found any case in CGEL that has comparison and that clause together, yet. Dec 11, 2013 at 13:00
• Are the examples your own? What is the reference to CGEL, p. 1101? Dec 11, 2013 at 13:25
• @BarrieEngland, Oh, now I know what I've done for confusing. [i] is not CGEL's case. I just put the number [i] for my easiness. And the [ii] happens to agree with the CGEL's numbering. Dec 11, 2013 at 14:11