2

We all know proper nouns refer to a specific person, place, organization, ect. Are names that do not refer to specific entities still considered proper nouns such as Samantha in the example below? If not, is there a term for nouns that are normally proper but are not when used in a general sense?


Samantha is a feminine given name. (Source)

  • If Samantha is a name, than "Samantha" is a name of a name, and hence still a proper noun. – TimLymington Dec 7 '13 at 22:08
  • @Tim - As per your first reply, wouldn't 'name of a name' repeat indefinitely then? – John Dec 7 '13 at 22:29
  • @TimLymington I think the question is not so much about the reference-referent distinction, as about the fact that "Samantha" does not refer to any particular person. – augurar Dec 7 '13 at 23:01
  • 2
    Why does this matter? What is your purpose? – tchrist Dec 7 '13 at 23:30
  • A more pertinent question, in my view, is why, if it were not the first word in the sentence, would it be given a capital letter? If it is not a proper noun surely one would write 'Do you like the name samantha?' The fact that we wouldn't write that seems to me to confirm that it is a proper noun. – WS2 Dec 8 '13 at 0:20
1

Samantha is a feminine given name.

Samantha is a proper noun whether it represents a real person or not. It is somebody's proper name, their first name.

One does not write, "There is a plethora of jennifers in school. Jennifer is a Proper noun.

The name of the room one sleeps in is a bedroom. It is not a proper noun. A city is not a proper noun, but how many Bethlehems are there? (a significant number.)

I don't think there is a way to get around a proper noun.

-1

If I understand your question correctly, you are asking about whether generic names like "Samantha" can be considered proper nouns, given that they lack specificity.

I think the distinction between proper and common nouns is more about whether the noun in question is a name or not. So although "China" can refer to either a town in Maine, or a country in Asia, it is still considered a proper noun. The same goes for "Samantha" – though it lacks specificity, it is still a name and hence a proper noun.

  • OP is asking if you should treat "Samantha" is a proper noun when discussing the name itself, such as "there are lots of towns named China". – DougM Dec 7 '13 at 23:23
  • @DougM You are mistaken. The question asks: "Are names that do not refer to specific entities still considered proper nouns?" – augurar Dec 8 '13 at 0:08
  • @DougM Even when using 'China' to refer to tableware I would tend to give it a capital letter. I was once taught (albeit a long time ago) that anything derived from a name should begin with a capital, hence 'George is a Christian', 'My favourite festival is Christmas', 'I love Shakespearean tragedy', etc. – WS2 Dec 8 '13 at 0:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.