0

In my writing I often use a comma and the past progressive tense (I think) to make sentences more concise.

For example:

The new design was more intuitive and user-friendly, reducing user errors.

Is this grammatically correct? Are there better alternatives?

1
  • 4
    The comma doesn't avoid using "and". Even if you'd used the alternative "and reduced user errors" it would still be required. It's just that "reducing" carries the strong implication the reduction in errors is a direct consequence of being more intuitive and user-friendly, rather than simply another characteristic of the new design. Nov 11, 2013 at 21:45

1 Answer 1

2

This is grammatically correct. In fact, replacing the comma with an and will remove the validity of the sentence.

"Reducing user errors" is a phrase. It has no subject, only a verb. This phrase shows another thing that the design does. The main thing the design does is that it is more intuitive and user-friendly. The phrase shows another thing that it does as a result of being more intuitive and user-friendly, in this case. This is a very good sentence. I would say that you continue using this format because it works very well.

3
  • 1
    @JohathanSpirit Thanks for your recommendations. I structure my sentences in this manner very often, so I am glad to here this is grammatically sound.
    – kmb385
    Nov 11, 2013 at 21:36
  • You are very welcome. I'm glad I could help. Nov 11, 2013 at 21:49
  • 1
    @kmb385 Before you and Jonathan sign off on this matter, I think you should both take note of Fumble Fingers' comment above.
    – WS2
    Nov 11, 2013 at 22:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.