I know that a gerund is a noun, so it should be modified by an adjective. However, it is also a verb form. Can I modify it by using an adverb?
-
2"A gerund behaves as a verb within a clause (so that it may be modified by an adverb or have an object); but the resulting clause as a whole (sometimes consisting of only one word, the gerund itself) functions as a noun within the larger sentence." That's straight from the Wikipedia article. Emphasis mine.– RegDwigнtNov 10, 2013 at 16:03
-
1Yes, an adjective or an adverb, but not both. "Slow and careful reading" or "reading slowly and carefully", but not *"slow reading carefully".– Peter ShorNov 10, 2013 at 16:40
-
@RegDwigt: Yes, but I thought we had all agreed that Wikipedia doesn't count as a general reference? The thing is that it is more efficient to present it as a specific question with a specific answer, rather than a long article that you have to browse through to find the bit of info you need. It's not even in the introduction of the article, in this case. Secondly, Wikipedia is very succinct here, with few examples and little explanation of the principles behind it. I've added some relevant information about what happens when it is treated more like a noun, for example. And what Peter says.– Cerberus - Reinstate MonicaNov 10, 2013 at 16:42
-
1Related: english.stackexchange.com/a/479169 english.stackexchange.com/q/66 english.stackexchange.com/q/346877 english.stackexchange.com/q/388099 english.stackexchange.com/q/428552 english.stackexchange.com/q/435916 english.stackexchange.com/q/428044 english.stackexchange.com/q/154886 english.stackexchange.com/q/366906 english.stackexchange.com/q/13860 english.stackexchange.com/q/148670 english.stackexchange.com/q/358212– tchrist ♦Jan 2, 2019 at 3:11
-
1Also related. There’s a million more where those come from.– tchrist ♦Jan 2, 2019 at 3:12
1 Answer
If you modify a gerund "from the outside", you treat it as a noun, and so you use an adjective:
That's quick thinking! (= that is a quick act of thinking)
I heard a faint rustling of feathers or clothes.
When emphasising the nominal aspect of a gerund as above, this normally corresponds with expressing the agent of the action with of. When you use a or an, this forces you to emphasise the nominal aspect.
But you can also modify a gerund from within the gerundial construction, where it functions as a verb, so you use an adverb:
She left by quickly crossing the street and hailing a cab.
I don't like speaking softly when there is no need.
Emphasising the verbal aspect of a gerund as above usually corresponds with not expressing the agent at all within the gerundial construction (but rather outside of it, e.g as the subject of the main clause, or the object, or whatever).
-
I've deleted my answer in deference to Cerberus' response. It is always great to learn something from this forum. My thanks to both of you. Nov 5, 2013 at 2:37
-
2@MichaelOwenSartin: You are too kind! I am obsessed with gerunds. Nov 5, 2013 at 2:41
-
2No, the -ing form modified by an adjective is always a noun, not a gerund. Evidence is that it never takes a direct object (because nouns can't take direct objects).– Greg LeeJan 2, 2019 at 3:24
-
@GregLee: And why is the test "can have direct object" conclusive on its own? That conclusiveness requires motivation. Gerunds are clearly somewhere in between nouns and verbs or both, so they will not conform too all the normal criteria of one group or the other, and a single simple criterion would be unlikely to be fair. Jan 2, 2019 at 10:56
-
1@Cerberus, That makes sense. However, the -ing word which is modified by an adjective acts only like a noun -- it has no verbal properties. It can be preceded by an article like other nouns, and modified by other noun modifiers, and it cannot take an adverb modifier (unlike a verb). "Gerund" is not a part of speech -- it's a verb, nothing but a verb, and it is not intermediate between noun and verb. It may fool you into thinking it's a noun, but that doesn't make it one.– Greg LeeJan 2, 2019 at 11:40