3

If there are two of something, can you say "all of" instead of "both of"?

For example, if an email is addressed to two people, and you start off with:

All,
This is to inform you, etc., etc.
...
Regards,
Me

Is that at all appropriate?

2
  • 1
    You can say "all" even if there is only one, or none at all. For my income tax, I am to list all of my dependents. It is possible that I have none.
    – GEdgar
    Commented Apr 15, 2012 at 1:24
  • @GEdgar: I disagree. The Taxman only specifies that you must list all your dependents, because he doesn't know how many (if any) you have - but it might be more than two. A cop would never say "Raise all your hands" to a single robber (although he might say "Raise both your hands" if he knew he wasn't dealing with a one-armed bandit! :). Commented Apr 15, 2012 at 14:00

3 Answers 3

4

I would say use "All" if you have three or more. If there are only two addressees, just name them.

"To: [email protected], [email protected]

From: [email protected]

Re: Doghouse plans

Dear Dick and Jane,

Please let me know if you have reviewed the plans for Spot's new doghouse. The contractor will be arriving Monday and we need to have any changes settled before then.

Regards, Dad."

"To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

From: [email protected]

Re: Doghouse plans

All,

Not to hurry you or anything, but it has been raining for the last three days, and Grandmom has been complaining about my bivouacking under the kitchen table. The sooner we can get this thing built, the faster you can get me out of the house so I'm not stinking up the kitchen with the smell of wet dog.

Bark bark, Spot"

1
  • That is a good alternative
    – Bob
    Commented Feb 18, 2011 at 21:11
4

Given that email typically takes on a conversational tone, sure. If the email (or letter) is more formal, perhaps use an alternative.

2

The example usage (an email sent to just two people) is probably a bad choice. Most recipients (if they could see that only one other person was cc'd in) would probably feel flattered.

Assuming the sender was competent in the English language, the only logical explanation would be that the writer had originally intended to address several others - but before clicking on "Send", had decided that only our flattered recipient and one other were worthy of being communicated with.

Outside of certain dialectal contexts where you all / y'all implies plural (largely because we no longer use "thou" for singular), "all" always implies more than two (as does several).

*There were only two answers to this question, and they were all unsatisfactory.

* denotes "marked" (i.e. - non-standard, unacceptable) usage.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.