5

I often send empty e-mails with just some attachments. Since some e-mail clients don't show the presence of attachments very clearly, I prefer to indicate that the e-mail contains attachments.

In French I just write "cf pj", which means "see attachment". What's the shortest abbreviation in English for "see attachment", "see enclosed file" or anything equivalent in an e-mail? The best I have found so far is "see att".

  • 2
    I don't mean to say that there's anything wrong with your question, but I'd recommend spelling it out when sending emails in English. – snailcar Oct 22 '13 at 22:24
  • and what's wrong with see att? It's just two letters longer than cf pj. You could say cf att (one letter shorter) but many folks don't get cf. – bib Oct 23 '13 at 1:45
  • I'm not sure how many people understand att. I wasn't aware that cf is valid in English, thanks that's good to know! cf att is indeed pretty good. I asked this question because I was surprised I couldn't find a short expression commonly used for this purpose, and given the answers so far there aren't any. – Franck Dernoncourt Oct 23 '13 at 2:19
  • "See files" is pretty short. – Mari-Lou A Oct 23 '13 at 6:14
  • 1
    "PFA the files" ? PFA - Please find attached, I am sure PFA is used very commonly – user49404 Oct 23 '13 at 7:09
5

I guess this term came in recently.

PFA - Please Find Attached.

Acronym Finder

4

There isn't any abbreviation that I'm aware of. But there should be, and perhaps will be.

Cc: (carbon copy) and Bcc: (blind carbon copy) are used to indicate a comparable type of meta info about a letter or email. In fact, they literally refer to a communication technology that is no longer in widespread use, but the actual function they refer to (sending to multiple recipients) is very much alive. Having a quick way to indicate an email attachment only makes sense. Off the top of my head, and using a similar format, how about Att: followed by a number: Att:1. Or by the file type(s): Att:jpg/zip.

  • That's quite a good idea. – Pitarou Oct 23 '13 at 6:22
  • 2
    In letters, it was common to use Enc. (for enclosed or enclosure) to indicate that there were other things in the envelope. That doesn't have much meaning for email, but I have seen Att. used at the bottom of an email for attachment. Merriam-Webster lists that meaning first, although Att. used at the top would probably be taken to mean Attention as "For the attention of ..." – Andrew Leach Oct 23 '13 at 6:36
3

encl: For enclosure. Hearkens back to envelopes containing papers. Similar to .cc and .bcc which are no longer literal but are in widespread use for electronic communication.

2

The absolute shortest? Leave it empty, and hope that the recipient notices the little icon that shows there's an attachment.

But if that's unacceptable, see attachment is the shortest. There is no widely recognised abbreviation. At least, not one that I'd recognise.

0

Agreed, there's "encl:" which seems to make sense, due to convention, but I've recently seen these two: Attch, and Att'd. I vote for "Attch."

  • Welcome to ELU. Please note that it is mandatory to attach any support/evidence to back up your claims. Please review our help center (english.stackexchange.com/help) to get additional information – Jony Agarwal Oct 30 '15 at 10:12

protected by tchrist Oct 13 '16 at 13:53

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.