2

I've been living in japan so long I don't remember how to speak English.
On some websites the authors uses the phrase "passive form" http://www.englishpage.com/verbpage/activepassive.html. While here I often read passive construction or passive voice but in highschool I never heard the phrase passive voice. The teacher only ever described a sentence as passive or active. I didn't hear that there was such a thing as passive voice until I began studying ancient Greek and had no idea that English verbs in the passive __ could be referee to as being in the passive voice but. Can I also use the word passive as a noun?

Ie. This verb is written in the passive.

  • Also, can I say "to be stopped is the 'passive' of "to stop" ? – Joshua Robison Feb 18 '11 at 17:36
  • I think I'm beginning to see that in English since we use several words to create a passive or negative meaning, it is more proper to say "passive / negative construction" when referring to English grammar. But... – Joshua Robison Feb 18 '11 at 18:06
  • When referring to grammar in another language where they don't use a construction of more than one word to create passive or negative meaning , it is more proper to refer to the word as being in the "negative form" for example in Japanese we say ikanai is the negative form of iku. I'm this sentence I would not say "ikanai" is the negative construction/voice of "iku" because it is only one word. Right? – Joshua Robison Feb 18 '11 at 18:10
2

In most cases, it doesn't matter terribly much whether you say "a passive verb" or "a verb in the passive" or "a verb in the passive voice" or "a verb with a passive construction". (Strictly, there isn't necessarily just one passive construction, e.g. you might say that "They were hurt" and "They got hurt" are two different passive constructions.)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.