4

Something to call someone who doesn't have a say in the choices that affect him the most?

Think 'a major stakeholder who has no voting rights,' ha!

2

I would say powerless. This can relate to both single or ongoing situations.

A child is powerless if parents decide to get move house/send him to a different school/ get divorced (depending on the style of parenting of course).

People are powerless in the face of governments which take no regard for their needs or views and impose unwanted regulations.

Depending on the situation you could say someone was at the mercy of, or subject to the whim of.

1

You could say they are hamstrung by not having their say - meaning feeling disabled or crippled (and thus being affected by this restriction).

0

In the context of a helpless outsider in a closed society, you could say that they were stranded. Stranded: to bring into or leave in a helpless position

0

The word dependent seems to fit nicely.

Defined as: determined or conditioned by another; decided or controlled by something else; needing someone or something else for support, help, etc.

Children are commonly referred to as dependents. Generally dependents have all their decisions made by the parents/guardians. The synonym - independent - is descriptive of someone who makes all of their own choices and decisions.

  • That applies only in certain situations. If someone were, say, confined in an institution (e.g. mental hospital, children's home, prison, & so on) you would not normally call them dependent even tho' they may have no say in matters affecting them. – TrevorD Oct 13 '13 at 14:19
0

Disfranchised? Strictly it only applies to matters of citizenship, but I have heard it used in a wider context. 'As far as my rights as an undergraduate are concerned I feel constantly disfranchised in this University'.

0

You could say the person "lacks agency" -- the ability to act, or to exercise that ability.

In this connection, you might find this other current ELA Question on the words 'agent' and 'agency' of some relevance or use.

(Just to be clear, I am NOT suggesting that either of these questions duplicates the other.)

0

Consider the term puppet

one whose acts are controlled by an outside force or influence - a puppet ruler

Often the term is used to suggest someone who appears to be in control, even when they are not. Also, it is not specifically limited to control of choices that affect him the most, although the term is usually used to describe important issues.

While it has many more implications, the term slave also refers to someone whose lives are fully controlled by others. One definition other than those that assume actual human ownership is

a person who is excessively dependent upon or controlled by something: the poorest people of the world are slaves to the banks

0

How about a subject? King's have subjects, whereas bosses don't.

Being a subject also implies that your subject to something, something that has control over you regardless of whether you consent or not.

-3

I would say "left in the lurch", "left high and dry", "forsaken", "forlorn", "destitute".

"Stranded" seems too weak : during a strike, passengers could be left stranded at an airport, but they are not entirely helpless and have a say, to a certain extent. At least, later on, compensation.

  • 1
    Sorry, downvote because I don't think any of these words mean someone who has no say in choices which affect him. You might be 'left in the lurch' by someone's unwanted actions but that doesn't mean you have can't alter the outcome. The first two also relate to single events rather than an ongoing situation, which is what I take the OP to mean. – Mynamite Oct 13 '13 at 12:05

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.