1

We are specialized in packing, and I have a client Email to me as below:

. . . do you over shrink-wrap service or is it included in the price?

He uses over here, what does he mean?

|improve this question
4

This is a typo or misspelling of "offer" – nothing more or less.

|improve this answer
  • Oh,yes, this makes sense. Thank you! +1 – user51225 Sep 6 '13 at 3:33
  • 1
    Vote up requires 15 reputation. – user51225 Sep 6 '13 at 5:21
  • 1
    Oh, right. Sorry! – James McLeod Sep 6 '13 at 9:34
  • 2
    This answer might be correct; however, it's worth noting that, in packaging, there is shrinkwrapping, which is also known as overwrapping. Conceivably, then, the inquiry could be a carelessly worded question about whether overwrapping/shrinkwrapping will cost an additional fee, or if it's included in the quoted price. It's hard to tell for sure, with such a small excerpt provided in the O.P.'s question. – J.R. Sep 6 '13 at 10:55
  • 1
    That's an interesting possibility which never occurred to me. Could be. – James McLeod Sep 6 '13 at 18:39
1

We cannot know for sure, but over is statistically rather more likely to be a typo for cover that merely left off the c- than it is for offer, whose edit distance is much further away.

|improve this answer
  • Much farther away? (1 vs 2 assuming Levenshtein_distance.) Furthermore, does your probability model incorporate the keyboard layout (proximity of the letters v and f), or the pronunciation similarity? I like your answer because it offers a valid alternative, but my immediate thought was also that it was a typo for offer. – iterums Sep 6 '13 at 12:32
  • @iterums It really depends on how you weight your edit-actions. I agree that key proximity should matter, since we’re talking about fumblefinger likelihood here. – tchrist♦ Sep 6 '13 at 12:39
  • This could be a post-spell-checker typo: offer is easily mistyped as ofer, then the wrong correction is accepted giving over. – Chris H Sep 6 '13 at 13:02
  • In the case of a human's fumble-fingered typo, I'd lean toward this theory: cover - c = over, with no resulting red squiggly line underneath. However, if it was a mistake made by speech recognition software, I might lean toward the other theory: ˈôfər ↝ˈōvər (or, if you'd prefer, ˈɑfər ↝ˈoʊvər), particularly if the speaker was talking fast and failing to enunciate clearly and carefully. – J.R. Sep 8 '13 at 9:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.