Typical actually means "of a particular type" but that particular type may not be difficult. What do you people think?
closed as unclear what you're asking by Hot Licks, bookmanu, TimLymington, sumelic, Scott Sep 22 '18 at 4:38
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Typical does not mean difficult. If something — a task, say, like icing a cake — is usually easy, it would be typical for it to be easy. Difficult, however, would never mean easy.
having the distinctive qualities of a particular type of person or thing
Those qualities might be difficulty, easiness, awkwardness, oddness, friendliness, whatever: the point is, they would be representative of a type.
No, they don't mean the same thing.
People may however use "typical" to express dissatisfaction with something. For example:
"Typical Jim, he's always late"
"Typical, I knew I was going to fall into that cake, my day is ruined".
As others have mentioned, "typical" does not mean "difficult". There are no common English idioms where this is the case, either.
But I wonder if the people who "usually" use this word are not actually just mispronouncing "difficult". Or possibly you are mis-hearing "difficult" as "typical". There are some common consonant mutations involved d --> t, f --> p, possibly elision of the final "t". I once had Tibetan Buddhist monk as a teacher, and I can imagine him pronouncing "difficult" this way.
I find that the word typical makes it seem like you're being characterized into a position that may not be true. A false perception.