15

I want to use the possessive noun form with et al. as in

et al.'s versus et al.

  • 3
    If you want answers to this question, you are going to have to rephrase it so that it makes sense in English. As it is now, it is utterly incomprehensible. – Janus Bahs Jacquet Aug 1 '13 at 1:49
  • 8
    You can say "the paper of Einstein et al." You can say "Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen's paper". Even though "Einstein et al.'s paper" is the grammatically proper form, I don't think you should use it as it looks informal and rather strange to me. – Peter Shor Aug 1 '13 at 2:21
  • 3
    You'd say either A et al.'s or A et aliarum/aliorum. – jlovegren Aug 1 '13 at 2:43
  • 2
    In most contexts, the expression should eminently serve the purpose, without the need for the possessive. "The FirstAuthor et al. research preceded the publication of the LaterAuthor et al. papers. – Kris Aug 1 '13 at 10:34
  • 1
    @DanielW: what's wrong with "we are combining the approach of Bergh et al. with ..."? I don't see why you would ever need to use Bergh et al.'s rather than of Bergh et al. – Peter Shor Apr 10 '18 at 12:24
17

The grammatically correct way is "Einstein et al.'s paper", because to indicate possession by a noun phrase in English, the 's should be applied to the end of the phrase. However, I don't believe this specific construction is used much, as to me that looks somewhat unusual and feels informal. I'd recommend using a different wording like "the paper of Einstein et al." or "Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen's paper".

  • 3
    Super late to the party here, but I though I should add that I can't find any mention of the "et al.'s" form in any style guide I have access to (checked about 6), which to me say it's so nonstandard none of them felt it worth bothering to mention. – Cary C Sep 4 '15 at 19:51
  • 3
    Hyper late... but Google Scholar finds over 3 million documents containing the phrase "et al.'s" so it is certainly used in practice. Some of them are even in the titles of much-cited papers from various fields. So... even though our collective gut tells us that it might be unusual and colloquial it seems to be quite common. :) – stefanct May 24 '18 at 11:54

protected by tchrist Oct 4 '15 at 22:25

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.