11

Have in mind what you want to take a picture of beforehand - shoot a single shot rather than taking many random pictures.

I came across this sentence and I'm confused about the verb following "rather than", it's in the -ing form but is it possible to have it in the infinitive as well?

I looked it up in my grammar book and it says that when using "rather than", the words before and after it should match, so the format should be infinitive-rather than-infinitive. But this is in the imperative. What is the rule for this?

| improve this question | |
10

Rather than is used both as a conjunction for infinitives and as a preposition.

In this example, rather than is a preposition, with a gerund as its object:

Shoot a single shot rather than taking many random pictures.

Here it's a conjunction linking the infinitives to shoot and to take:

She wanted to shoot a single shot rather than take many random pictures.

You can use rather than as a conjunction anywhere you can use an infinitive, including the bare infinitive of the imperative mood. (The verb following rather than is always a bare infinitive.)

In other contexts, use rather than as a preposition with a gerund. Note that some people object to rather than as a preposition, preferring instead of for the non-infinitive uses.

| improve this answer | |
  • I wouldn't class taking as a 'gerund' in Shoot a single shot rather than taking many random pictures - it echoes (I think that term hasn't been allotted a precise grammatical sense yet) shoot rather than single shot. It's too far towards the verb end of the noun - verb continuum to be labelled gerund. Thus, I'm also having difficulty accepting rather than as a (compound) preposition here. In Tonight I think I’d like to go to a movie rather than go dancing it is very difficult to claim prepositionality. And I believe rather than is more a subordinator with the -ing form also. – Edwin Ashworth May 21 '13 at 9:04
  • 1
    @EdwinAshworth In “go to a movie rather than go dancing,” rather than is a conjunction linking two infinitives (go and go), not a preposition. The preposition + gerund form would be “go to a movie rather than going dancing.” I'm not sure what your objection is to calling it a gerund: It's an –ing verb serving grammatically as the object of a preposition, a noun. What else would you call it? (Also note that American Heritage calls it a gerund in the linked article at the end.) – Bradd Szonye May 21 '13 at 9:18
  • Ah, but it's an -ing form serving semantically more like a verb. And the grammar would be inconsistent: “go to a movie rather than leisure / lancers / book / ball-game”. Typical nouns do not work here (apart from in to-PPs with the to elided: "go to a movie rather than (to) school). – Edwin Ashworth May 21 '13 at 10:20
  • @EdwinAshworth “I'd like to go to a movie rather than a ball game” is fine. The other examples are wrong because of semantics and parallelism, not grammar. They wouldn't work with the preposition instead of either. To return to the earlier example: Dancing is a gerund in “I'd like (to go to a movie rather than) dancing,” with or without the parenthesized phrase. – Bradd Szonye May 21 '13 at 10:52
  • 1
    @EdwinAshworth There's nothing wrong with the grammar of “I'd like (to go to a movie rather than) cake”; it's just terrible style because it subverts parallelism. In contrast, “I'd like (to go to a movie rather than) dancing” sets up a parallel between two non-finite verbs, the infinitive to go and the gerund dancing. I honestly don't see what's objectionable about it or what's odd about calling it a gerund. It's a non-finite verb in the role of a noun, which makes it a gerund. – Bradd Szonye May 21 '13 at 21:49
0

You've checked a grammar book & it gave you the answer you're looking for:

"Shoot a single shot rather than take many random pictures"

is normal, standard, formal written English, but people don't speak English the way they write it; rather, they write it the way they speak it.

| improve this answer | |
  • That's only half the story though – rather than can be a conjunction or a preposition. – Bradd Szonye May 21 '13 at 5:05
  • @Bradd: It's standard practice to cite references for this sort of claim & to give examples of how the usage rules for one form differs from those for the other. Otherwise, it's just a personal opinion with no support. No one can read your mind, & some of us prefer parallel structures regardless of whether we're using conjunctions or prepositions. If you're not going to tell the other half of the story, at least provide a pointer to where it is told. – user21497 May 21 '13 at 5:12
  • Sorry, I figured you already knew that rather than was also a preposition, with an example in the original question (which is why it uses a participle rather than an infinitive). I wasn't sure whether you were acknowledging the other version as acceptable, or qualifying that it's only acceptable in speech. – Bradd Szonye May 21 '13 at 5:20
  • 1
    @Bradd: The dictionary entry shows parallel construction in its examples. M-W's Dictionary of English Usage (pp 797-798) says that when the phrases on either side are parallel, rather than is a conjunction. It also says that using a gerund after rather than is common, standard English. The fact is, both forms are used & seem acceptable. The dispute seems to be based on etymology rather than on current usage. If usage dictates what we can write in formal English--that's what the CGEL claims--then either form is acceptable. I accept both forms but use parallelism where possible. – user21497 May 21 '13 at 5:58
  • @Bradd: I hadn't read your answer before responding to your comment. Sorry about that. You gave references. I apologize for being too quick on the trigger. My problem, not yours. – user21497 May 21 '13 at 6:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.