5

I'm trying to write the sentence,

Lower-grade soldiers made up two-thirds of the putative high quality army.

My original sentence was:

Lower-grade soldiers made up two-thirds of what was supposed to be a high quality army.

To make the sentence more efficient and more suitable for a formal paper, I tried looking up one word that would fit in there and came up with putative. Am I using the word properly?

I was also considering reputed, but the definition of putative ("commonly regarded as being: the putative father") seemed to fit better for what I'm trying to get at.

5

“... The putative high quality army” is grammatically incorrect, while “... the putatively high quality army” is grammatically correct but clumsy or misleading. A phrasing like “Lower-grade soldiers made up two-thirds of what was, putatively, a high quality army” would be slightly less awful. Your original sentence with “what was supposed to be” would be a better choice than any of the phrasings with putatively. However, you might also consider using a near-synonym, ostensibly: “Low-grade soldiers made up two-thirds of an ostensibly high-quality army”.

  • 1
    +1 I agree with every single point. I think you would sooner use putative immediately before a noun (not before another adjective), where the noun expresses a status that can be disputed. – Cerberus May 20 '13 at 21:41
1

I would consider simply using "supposedly" in that sentence. If you want something more fancy "purportedly" is another possibility that may be closer to the meaning you want.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.