I recently asked this question on Programmers.SE:

Ways to use your skills as a developer to give back to the community/charities.

You hear a lot about "giving back", but is it really what should be used? I got the following comment on my question that spurred some thoughts:

Hate the term "give back". To "give back" means that you took something in the start. "Donation", "Endowment", "Charity" are much better descriptors.

Is "giving back" correct when:

  • I was originally given the same thing? (they gave me a can of food, and I give back the can of food later on in life)
  • I was originally given something different? (they give me a can of food, I build them a website later in life)
  • I was never given anything? (they give me nothing, I build them a website)
  • 1
    Today’s use of the phrase "give back" denotes the underlying concept so popular now; that the successful owe the unsuccessful, or the initiated owe the uninitiated. I fail to understand the concept, but to disagree or ask questions these days one is usually over run by louder voices with no intellectual depth. A more proper concept which will result in appropriate appreciation and thanks on the receiver’s part might be “charity, benevolence, generosity” concepts which indicate a gift to a community because of the concern and generosity of an individual or company for a cause or community. – user32562 Dec 20 '12 at 19:21

The way I see it, "giving back" is a short form of "giving something back in return for the help you previously got from the community".

The comment might have a point, it's not as if you are obliged to give anything in return, but one could argue that other people took some of their time to help you when you needed it, and now you are giving back that time.

| improve this answer | |

It's not really supposed to be a very precise concept. It's meant to invoke a general sense that we all depend on each other's participation in society for our well-being, and that much of what we "have" in many senses may be meaningfully thought of as "given", so that for us to go out of our way to contribute to society at large is, in some sense, "giving back" -- sharing the fruits of our advantages with others, as we received in our turn.

It mostly only makes sense, in the way you're asking about, when one is speaking of "giving back" to society in general, rather than particular people or organizations. Part of the idea is that, at that level, your third case, that you were never given anything, cannot really ever be the case unless your name is Tarzan. For the first and second cases, sure, there's no implication that what you "give back" should or should not resemble anything in particular you were "given".

In its best forms, I feel, there's also no particular implication that this is something you have to or are obligated to do; it's a nice thing to do if you feel it's appropriate. It's saying you want to live in the kind of world where people do things like that for each other. It also has a pleasing element of humility to it; using the term says that one is not sitting on high dispensing charity and favors to the "less fortunate", one is helping others as one was helped.

| improve this answer | |

As @GreweKokkor said, "give back" implies that you got some benefit from the community to which you're giving. As @chaos said, the nature of that benefit can be somewhat fluid.

An alternative phrase for this concept that I've heard in recent years is "paying it forward" -- rather than "payback", which looks backward to what you got, it evokes a notion of providing a foundation for those who will follow.

| improve this answer | |
  • "Pay it forward" +1 – Mazura Aug 13 '14 at 6:01

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.