I have the following technical detail to log in work:

There is no communication between each of the ComboBoxes containers

The component is called a ComboBox in singular. Is this correct, or do I need to add an apostrophe to ComboBoxes?

  • 1
    Brian, it's often better to be long-winded. Really spell it out - at length. And repeat yourself redundantly. There is no communication between any ComboBox container, and, any other ComboBox container. It's impossible for any ComboBox container, to communicate with any other ComboBox container. This applies to every ComboBox container. – Fattie Jun 18 '11 at 22:00

If each container contains one or several ComboBoxes, it might be better to use ComboBox containers instead, in the same way we use apple containers or orange containers to describe containers containing apples or oranges.

Grammatically, ComboBox containers is a compound noun with containers modified by ComboBox.

| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    +1 That's what I thought too. On the other hand, if they are containers within the ComboBoxes, or part of the ComboBoxes (my knowledge of UI design is admittedly minuscule), then he may have to say ComboBoxes' containers. – Tragicomic Feb 2 '11 at 11:31
  • Lovely stuff, both answers appreciated. Now I know where the apostrophe would go, and also ComboBox containers sounds better than what I had – user4485 Feb 2 '11 at 11:53

There is no communication between each of the ComboBoxes containers.

A noun that is used as modifier is used in its singular form, in English; see for example 32-bit architecture.

Instead of using each of, which is better used in sentences like Doug had money from each of his five uncles, I would use each; the sentence would become

There is no communication between each ComboBox container.

Alternatively, it can be changed to

There is no communication between the ComboBox containers.

| improve this answer | |
  • "between each singular-noun" is somewhat problematic. I like your last version best. – Ben Voigt Jun 18 '11 at 22:38

I have heard a rule that inanimate objects should not take a possessive. Here is a way to both obey the rule and avoid the apostrophe:

There is no communication among the containers of ComboBoxes.

| improve this answer | |
  • That's weird. The airplane's wings. The jacket's sleeves. The Earth's atmosphere. The flower's smell. The dessert's flavor. The car's engine. The chair's legs. The bed's softness. What's wrong with these? I also find your suggested phrasing awkward. – ErikE Jun 19 '11 at 2:16
  • @ErikE, see this Chicago Manual of Style entry for "Possessives and attributes" at chicagomanualofstyle.org/CMS_FAQ/PossessivesandAttributives/…. The OP question falls under the category of "When a possessive gets ugly, give it up." Here are some others that I consider ugly and harsh on the ear: "The lens's aperture," "The Lentz's ship," "Robert Reich's exchange," and "The ComboBoxes's communication." Whether inanimate objects take a possessive for attributes is in a state of flux. Strunk & White say "Never," CMOS says "Sometimes." – rajah9 Jun 20 '11 at 15:25
  • Style manuals flux away. I'll stop saying "the airplane's wings" when we all have pocket teleportation devices. :) – ErikE Jun 20 '11 at 20:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy