Can I say

He is yet to be a murderer.

to mean the he is not a murderer, but very soon he will be one?

  • Hmm, but would you apply that same lawyerly-mumbo jumbo nuance to the much more common wording "He is not a murderer, yet" or "He is not yet a murderer"? At least in casual North American English, such sentences would have embedded within them a strong expectation that he would eventually become a murderer. I can follow the legalistic, lawyer-B.S. denial in @Robusto's comments, but would that also be the case in these much more common examples? I am curious... – Shawn Mooney Feb 9 '13 at 14:58

I think this could be construed to mean something different, depending on context. It could actually be a rejection of the notion that the person mentioned is or will be a murderer.

For example,

Mr. Johnson may be many things, many of them unpleasant: a career criminal, a liar, a deadbeat husband. But he is yet to be a murderer.

This means that whatever bad things he has done, he has stopped short of murder. It is the kind of statement a defense attorney might make in a trial on behalf of his client. Sure, he's a bad man, but he's not a killer.

  • 1
    I agree. It's a great point and definitely valid when it comes to language and I even think I've heard it in the context of law before, but now when I stop to think about it, it sounds awkward. I don't see this coming positively towards the guy. Somehow it implies, in myself at least, that he is planning on murdering someone. Either way, I agree with this answer. – RiMMER Feb 9 '13 at 12:26
  • 1
    Agree with both of you. You and I are not murderers (AFAIK). But Mr Johnson is not a murderer -yet. – TimLymington Feb 9 '13 at 13:01
  • 1
    The idiom in American English is have yet to VP, as in He has yet to [be beaten at chess/conquer the summit of Aconcagua/try the really hot sauce]. The idiom means have not yet VP, and is negative, as can be seen by the fact that yet is a negative polarity item. – John Lawler Feb 9 '13 at 17:09
  • 1
    I didn't really consider the be yet to, and in any event the distinction between official has and official is gets lost in most speech, so it's likely there's a dual idiom with be for every one that starts with have. I agree with Robusto about that. It may or may not go out of fashion in print; but some people are hearing -- and therefore saying, and often writing -- be instead of have. And it's not going to change in speech as long as it's heard. – John Lawler Feb 10 '13 at 6:01
  • 1
    I and I'm are almost indistinguishable, and one tends to say or hear I'm far more frequently. That gives it a different distribution than 3rd person. Plus, of course, NGrams are writing only, and indifferently spelled, punctuated, and tagged, so, to the extent this reflects a real trend in real spoken language, it's going to show a lot of distortion, because the occasions and skills for writing that phrase are not the same as those for speaking it. Especially an archaic construction. – John Lawler Feb 10 '13 at 17:26

The word yet, when used as an adverb, means that something has not occured at a particular point in time

up until the present or a specified or implied time; by now or then:
I haven’t told anyone else yet
aren’t you ready to go yet?
I have yet to be convinced

In each of the examples, there is a connotation that the situation is likely, or at least potentially, about to change.

Most US speakers would read the example given to mean

He is yet to be a murderer [but I am not sure how long that innocence will last].

If I were to proclaim proudly

I have yet to cheat on my spouse

my wife would take it ill. She expects nothing less than

I have not cheated on my spouse, or better yet
I would never cheat on my spouse.


Robusto's answer shows the valid present interpretation of 'is yet to be' - how can one possibly be certain what is yet to be or what someone is yet to do (unless one is a prophet).

However, there is the possibility of using the present tense to refer to a historical event or time interval:

In 1928, Hollywood is yet to be discovered by the Marx Brothers.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.