I've read a great article about the usage of apostrophes. But there are still some points that are unclear.

Why do we say...

  • school project but not school's project?
  • car service but not car's service or even cars' service (plural form)?
  • apostrophe usage but not apostrophe's usage or apostrophes' usage?

4 Answers 4


Because all three are compound nouns, which have nothing to do with the Saxon genitive. "Car service" is a type of service. "Car's service" would be service owned by a car. Much like railway is a type of way, not a way belonging to a rail. Compounds don't have to be written as one word, though. That is all.


When you use an apostrophe in such a way, you denote possession, which is different from what you get with compound nouns (usually the type).

The school's project (the project of the school) is most likely not a school project (the type of project). In the same way Ben's project is his project, whereas a Ben project would be a project about Ben.

  • Except for a lot of other uses of apostrophes. Most of which don't follow any consistent rules, anyway. And all of which are misused, according to somebody's rule or other. Jan 29, 2013 at 17:57
  • Also to denote plurals in acronyms. "John got 3 A's this term".
    – jn1kk
    Jan 29, 2013 at 18:36

With the possible exception of apostrophe, none of those examples is necessarily particularly possessive, but context can make all the difference.

Unlike, say, a school's mascot, which is uniquely associated as being owned by the school (as a sort of branding), a school project is typically something that individuals do as a part of their school work. In this case, school is an adjective describing the general type of project, not, specifically, the owner of the project. An exception here might be a unified school-sponsored event; the school's (annual service) project might be to clean litter off campus, for example, but that's kind of a contrived example.

Similarly, the service is something that's done generally to the car, it's not something that would be uniquely associated as being possessed specifically by the car. For example, the car service may be done to any number of cars, but that car's bumper (as a possessive counter-example) might be difficult to replace. I think, again, depending on context, car's service could be legitimate. For example, my friend provides a standard car service to people around town, but my car's service might include a little extra detailing.

The apostrophe is a bit trickier, I think, because in this case, the particular usage is unique to apostrophes. I might be (probably am) wrong, but I don't see anything incorrect with referring to apostrophes' usage, although I think it's more common to refer to the non-possessive apostrophe usage. That may be because usage implies a passivity on the part of the apostrophe (which is inanimate to begin with), so it's not considered something that the apostrophes own a specific claim to, but rather simply something that is done, in general, to apostrophes.

In all those cases, the possessives of the plurals which end with s would be a simple apostrophe. (e.g. cars', not cars's).


These examples are perhaps better regarded as adjectival nouns, for example in "school project" school is an adjectival noun (I think adjectival noun is more descriptive than the more modern terms noun adjunct or attributive noun). It should in most cases be possible to decide whether the noun is being used as an adjectival noun or as a possessor and thus whether the apostrophe is needed.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.