What's the proper plural for "photo" - "photos", "photoes", or it is generally desired to rephrase the whole thing and stick with "photographs", "images", "shots", "pictures", etc?
As for usage frequency, quick Google search reveals that:
- "photos" => ~5,380,000,000 ghits
- "photoes" => ~3,340,000 ghits, which is ~1000 times less often used, although some of the results point to English grammar forums where some people suggest that "photoes" might be indeed correct form given Greek origin of the word
Dictionary check reveals:
- Oxford clearly gives plural as "photos", but suggests that "photoes" is a verb
- Merriam-Webster gives plural as "photos", but does not recognize "photoes" as a valid word at all, albeit it does recognize "photoed" as a verb
- Cambridge gives "photos", clearly makes it as AmE-only and also insists that there's no verb - i.e. no "photoes", no "photoed", no "photoing"
- Collins agreed on "photos" and agreed on that verb does not exist
- Douglas-Harper Online Etymology Dictionary tells us that both noun and verb exist - the noun is since 1860, the verb is first recorded 1868, from the noun.
I'm kind of hesitating here. If you'd ask me, I'd rather opt for not using plural forms of "photo" at all - both "photos" and "photoes" feel somewhat awkward for me (as do "audios", "videos" or "alphas" / "betas" / "gammas" / "deltas").
So, generally, what's the most neutral way to refer to a group of photographs? Bonus points for revealing BrE/AmE differences.