3

Colloquially speaking, "to push somebody's buttons" means to irritate or annoy the person. And, "know what buttons to push" means to know what to do to get people to act the way you want.

I can't understand how come "buttons" are associated with people and their behavior. How did these idioms come to be?

Edit: I feel I am not being clear with the question. What I intend to understand is the relation of a person's pysch and buttons. As it is unusual to talk of hurting a machine's feeling, likewise it should be unusual to speak of somebody's button as well. This being my point, how did the metaphorical idiom originate(and considered meaningful)?

2
  • 3
    I get what you're asking. We all know you can push a button on a machine and get a reaction (light goes on, motor cranks, etc.) but there must be an origin for the common understanding that we, like robots, have buttons that can be pushed. I have had no success unearthing that origin. Commented Apr 24, 2013 at 18:49
  • 1
    Thanks Kristina for re-wording it in a far better manner.
    – Sayan
    Commented Apr 25, 2013 at 6:59

3 Answers 3

8

It's a metaphorical usage, so there doesn't have to be a direct link between people and pushing the buttons they don't have.

Dictionary.com indicates the phrase originated in 1920s America, when domestic electricity was being installed on a massive scale. The ability to push a button to turn something on had a big impact on lifestyle, and the metaphor spilled over into other things which have an immediate effect — like being able to trigger a specific emotion.

During the 1920s the spread of technology transformed the way average Americans lived their daily lives. In 1920 only 34.7 percent of American dwellings had electricity; by 1930 67.9 percent had electric power. In the cities the growth was even more dramatic: 84.8 percent of all urban homes were wired for electricity by 1930, compared to only 47.4 percent a decade earlier.

At the turn of the century, families with a comfortable income depended on servants, hired labor, and delivery men to support their day-to-day lives. The new technology available in the 1920s—combined with a diminishing supply of people willing to work as servants—caused more and more middle-class fami-lies to do their own housework. By 1926 80 percent of American homes with incomes more than $3,000 had vacuum cleaners and washing machines.

American Decades © The Gale Group Inc

1
  • 3
    I would note also that the equivalence in many other phrases between light, heat, and anger itself help to further demonstrate the point; if someone "lights up" they are expressing strong, sudden emotion (though usually more pleasant than angry in this phrase), for instance. +1
    – BrianH
    Commented Apr 24, 2013 at 17:09
4

I can't understand how come "buttons" are associated with people and their behavior.

With machinary, you do one thing, and something else happens. Sometimes, the same things happens with people's emotions. You say the wrong words, and they react in a visible way. You show them something really cool, and they get excited.

The metaphors abound, and they're not limited to push his buttons. We also have:

  • flipped his switch
  • tripped his trigger
  • turned his crank
  • turned him off (or on)

Those are all cause-and-effect metaphors between machinary and people. (I'd guess there are others, too; those are just the ones I could think of off the top of my head.)

"Well the army never turned his crank / But love sure made him brave"
(from the song Duncan by Sarah Slean)

0

Christine Ammer, The American Heritage Dictionary of Idioms, second edition (2013) has this relevant entry:

push someone's buttons Also, press someone's buttons. Draw a strong emotional response from someone, especially anger or sexual arousal. For example, My mother-in-law really knew how to push my buttons, or A good-looking redhead, she always seemed to press his buttons. This metaphoric expression transfers activating some mechanism by pressing buttons to human emotions {Slang, 1920s}

And J.E. Lighter, Random House Historical Dictionary of American Slang (1994) has this:

push (someone's) buttons to elicit a strongly favorable or unfavorable emotional response (from someone), esp. anger or sexual excitement. Also vars. [Earliest two cited examples:] 1927 H. Miller Moloch 22: I must have just touched the button. {1936 in Garon Blues 69: Just press my button, give my bell a ring.}

The 1927 instance that Lighter cites is from Henry Miller, Moloch: Or This Gentile World. Unfortunately I couldn't find a previewable or snippet-viewable copy of this novel online, so I can't add any context to the very brief excerpt that appears there. The 1936 example reproduced in Paul Garon, Blues and the Poetic Spirit (1996), however, is readable in full. It's from a song (evidently actually from 1932) sung by Lil Johnson (with Black Bob) titled "Press My Button":

My man thought he was raising sand, / I said "Give it to me, baby, you don't understand. / Where'd you put that thing? / Where'd you put that thing? / Just press my button, give my bell a ring."

Come on baby, let's have some fun, / Put your hot dog in my bun, / And I'll have that thing, / That ting-a-ling. / Just press my button, give my bell a ring.

My man's out in the rain and cold, / He's got the right key but just can't find the hole. / He say, "What's that thing? / That ting-a-ling. / I've been pressing your button, and your bell won't ring."

This was about 47 years before disco princess Anita Ward mined the same shaft with "Ring My Bell."

Interestingly, Lighter also includes an entry for a somewhat similar and slightly older expression:

push the right buttons to manage to get the desired results, esp. by manipulating another person. [Earliest cited example:] {1906 A.H. Lewis Confessions 22: Now, if you give me any lip, I'll push a button or two and have you sent out to Harlem.}

Lighter doesn't claim any lineal connection between the two expressions, but the idea of "pushing a button" as a figurative representation of manipulating someone seems quite strong in both phrases.

One of the earliest instances of "button pushing" as a metaphor for exerting control over another person appears in Anonymous, "I Pursue My M.A." in The New Student (February 15, 1928):

But last summer is gone and it is the present that is worrying me now. I looked forward to this graduate school as a sort of heaven. I was tired of having other persons push my thinking buttons; here, I believed, I should get a chance to push them for myself.

Even earlier is this instance from Kate Sargent, "Push or Be Pushed," in Forum (October 1927):

The Pedestrian's note of alarm over the prospect of too much leisure struck no responsive chord in this optimistic breast. The purveying of news—my job,—holds out as yet no threat of any future two hour day. It can not be fulfilled by pressing a button; rather, I should say, we are the buttons that other people push.

Nevertheless, Lil Johnson aside, these early instances don't precisely involve the now-familiar sense of "pushing someone's buttons" as a metaphor for directing or controlling that person's emotional response. One of the earliest instances I've found of that modern usage appears is in L. Ron Hubbard, Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health, a Handbook of Dianetic Therapy (1950):

find that certain words make the husband wince or make him angry or make him refrain from doing something and so they use these "push-buttons". And husbands find their wives' push-buttons and keep them from buying clothes or using the car. This defensive and offensive dueling amongst aberrees is occasioned by push-buttons reacting against push-buttons. Whole populaces are handled by their push-button responses. Advertising learns about push-buttons and uses them in such things as "body-odor" or constipation. And in the entertainment field and the song-writing field push-buttons are pushed in whole racks and batteries to produce aberrated responses. Pornography appeals to people who have pornographic push-buttons. Corn-and-games government appeals to people who have "care for me" push-buttons and others. It might be said that there is no necessity to appeal to reason when there are so many push-buttons around.

...

... and any other precise restimulator can "push-button" the aberree into action or apathy if they are used upon him. In words it has to be the exact word; for instance painted will not do when painter is in the engram. What is painted, however, may be an associative restimulator and the aberree may declare he does not like it; that he does not like it does not mean that it will "push his buttons" and make him cough or sigh or get angry or get sick or whatever the engram containing the word dictates he should do.)

Given the vast readership of this book over the decades, I would not be surprised if Hubbard's lengthy discourse on "push-button" responses to strategic (or at least tactical) verbal stimuli bears much of the responsibility for popularization, during the second half of the twentieth century, of the concept of "pushing [someone's] buttons." If so, I'm glad it was "push his buttons" that made the jump into the mainstream English vocabulary rather than "aberree" or "restimulator."

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .