Timeline for And/or in total negation: "Some people are not able to interpret and/or analyze"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2012 at 1:53 | vote | accept | curious-proofreader | ||
| Dec 13, 2012 at 1:53 | vote | accept | curious-proofreader | ||
| Dec 13, 2012 at 1:53 | |||||
| Dec 13, 2012 at 1:53 | vote | accept | curious-proofreader | ||
| Dec 13, 2012 at 1:53 | |||||
| Nov 1, 2012 at 14:52 | comment | added | user21497 | @curious-proofreader: I asked a question here last week. When I looked at the answers, I saw a gray check mark to the left of each one. I clicked on the one I thought was a sufficient answer (and the best answer) to my question. That meant that I had accepted the answer. | |
| Nov 1, 2012 at 14:50 | comment | added | user21497 | Think "neither A nor B". That may help. | |
| Nov 1, 2012 at 11:43 | comment | added | tchrist♦ | What is this “total negation” thing you keep talking about? I have never heard of it before. | |
| Nov 1, 2012 at 11:24 | answer | added | Russell McMahon | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 1, 2012 at 7:29 | answer | added | user21497 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 1, 2012 at 7:28 | comment | added | user21497 | @Kris: If you see no inconsistency in ambiguity, then you're projecting, interpolating, and mind-reading. It makes no sense to me because it requires me to choose what it means, not what the writer wants it to mean. | |
| Nov 1, 2012 at 6:29 | comment | added | Kris | I don't see any inconsistency in the sentence -- it makes sense as it is. | |
| Nov 1, 2012 at 6:13 | history | asked | curious-proofreader | CC BY-SA 3.0 |