Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
7 hours ago history became hot network question
9 hours ago answer added Tinfoil Hat timeline score: 5
11 hours ago answer added Edwin Ashworth timeline score: 5
11 hours ago history edited Edwin Ashworth
edited tags
S 11 hours ago history notice added tchrist Comments only
S 11 hours ago history locked tchrist
S 11 hours ago history mod moved comments to chat
S 11 hours ago comment added tchrist Answers go in the answer box: comments providing answers will be removed. Comments have been moved to chat; do not continue the discussion here. Before posting a comment below this one, please review the purposes of comments. Comments that do not request clarification or suggest improvements usually belong as an answer, on English Language & Usage Meta, or in English Language & Usage Chat. Comments continuing discussion may be removed.
12 hours ago history edited Ellen Spertus CC BY-SA 4.0
Replaced "recgonizable" with "less dated" and "term" with "noun"
12 hours ago comment added Ellen Spertus I'm in my 50s in the US, and "sucker" and "sap" sound to me like things that would be said in a black and white movie like Guys and Dolls. Google Books Ngram Viewer confirms that their usage in the last century peaked in the 1920s and 1930s. I'll rephrase my question.
12 hours ago comment added Edwin Ashworth Adjectives, offered here, are 'gullible' and 'naive'; if you require a noun only, please indicate this. Have you tried looking in a thesaurus? Pushover is offered here, in an earlier thread.
15 hours ago comment added Stuart F Which younger generations? Where?
15 hours ago comment added fev What makes you think sucker or sap are not understood or used by younger generations?
15 hours ago history asked Ellen Spertus CC BY-SA 4.0