Skip to main content
25 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S May 22 at 13:01 history notice removed CommunityBot
S May 22 at 13:01 history unlocked CommunityBot
May 17 at 2:25 review Suggested edits
May 17 at 6:07
May 17 at 0:21 answer added C.R. Kunferman timeline score: 1
May 16 at 10:42 answer added Mikhail Katz timeline score: 2
May 15 at 21:59 answer added Xavier timeline score: 0
May 15 at 15:10 answer added Trunk timeline score: 0
May 15 at 13:10 answer added digimunk timeline score: 2
May 15 at 13:05 answer added SCP timeline score: 1
S May 15 at 12:50 history notice added tchrist Comments only
S May 15 at 12:50 history locked tchrist
May 15 at 3:02 answer added traktor timeline score: 6
May 15 at 0:43 answer added Chris Sunami timeline score: 0
May 14 at 16:41 answer added terdon timeline score: 9
May 14 at 14:38 answer added Michael Seifert timeline score: 13
May 14 at 14:12 answer added user57832 timeline score: 2
May 14 at 13:49 answer added Ant timeline score: 20
May 14 at 9:40 comment added Janus Bahs Jacquet Completely unrelated, but the phrase ‘only three legs’ applied to a hare completely threw me. In my mind, animals like hares belong in the same group as squirrels and kangaroos, animals that have two legs (and two arms), so three would be one too many rather than one too few. Having just looked at a bunch of images of hares, I’m forced to concede that the forelimbs on hares are indeed much more leg-like than arm-like, but my brain is struggling to accept this reclassification.
May 14 at 7:12 history became hot network question
May 14 at 5:55 answer added user405662 timeline score: 11
May 13 at 23:39 answer added DjinTonic timeline score: 3
May 13 at 23:21 history edited tchrist CC BY-SA 4.0
edited tags; improved formatting; significant copyedit for wording
May 13 at 23:14 history edited tchrist
edited tags
S May 13 at 23:11 review First questions
May 14 at 2:41
S May 13 at 23:11 history asked boni aditya CC BY-SA 4.0