Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 9 at 5:49 comment added Peter @DaleM, I wasn't specifically referring to smog. Wood fires can certainly create "thick air" indoors, especially as chimneys would not have been universal in Shakespeare's time.
Mar 9 at 5:40 comment added Dale M @Peter in 1500 London was home to about 50,000 people as opposed to 5 million in 1900. That’s not enough fires no matter what they’re burning to make smog.
Mar 9 at 5:38 comment added Dale M @Elliot London wasn’t particularly foggy in Shakespeare’s day, nor is it unusually foggy now. The fogs were primarily a result of coal fired heating and cooking in the nineteenth and early 20th century.
Mar 9 at 5:37 comment added Peter Wood smoke can make the air quite thick enough.
Mar 9 at 5:05 comment added Elliot In Shakespeare's day the were living in London. All the fog you need.
Jan 27 at 22:47 comment added Peter Jennings Possibly, but did they have thick fogs in Shakespeare's day? I thought that was a phenomenon of coal burning Victorian times. But then I suppose we've always had fogs of various densities naturally , just not smoke enhanced ones.
Jan 27 at 21:14 history answered Dale M CC BY-SA 4.0