Skip to main content
5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 3, 2014 at 0:23 history edited Robusto CC BY-SA 3.0
added 18 characters in body
Oct 3, 2014 at 0:22 comment added Robusto So who said it couldn't be negative?
Mar 13, 2012 at 21:31 comment added Jon Purdy @joon: I agree. Pariah is a much more negative term. It originally referred to a member of a low Indian caste, and was only recently (1819) extended to mean “social outcast”.
Mar 13, 2012 at 21:26 comment added joon pariah sounds like it has negative or accusatory connotation, but I'm not sure (non native speaker). The author refers to himself as being ostracized, which is different than viewing oneself as a pariah, no? Outcast is maybe more neutral?
Mar 13, 2012 at 21:21 history answered Robusto CC BY-SA 3.0