Skip to main content
added 124 characters in body
Source Link
alphabet
  • 19.6k
  • 3
  • 22
  • 132

Why can't I say "He was expelled for the killing of the birds?"

You actually can say that. It isn't grammatically incorrect and it makes perfect sense. It does make it somewhat less explicit that he was the one who killed the birds, but in context that fact would still be obvious.

Huddleston & Pullum never say that such a sentence would be incorrect; it just isn't the example they happen to choose.

Why can't I say "He was expelled for the killing of the birds?"

You actually can say that. It isn't grammatically incorrect and it makes perfect sense. It does make it somewhat less explicit that he was the one who killed the birds, but in context that fact would still be obvious.

Why can't I say "He was expelled for the killing of the birds?"

You actually can say that. It isn't grammatically incorrect and it makes perfect sense. It does make it somewhat less explicit that he was the one who killed the birds, but in context that fact would still be obvious.

Huddleston & Pullum never say that such a sentence would be incorrect; it just isn't the example they happen to choose.

Source Link
alphabet
  • 19.6k
  • 3
  • 22
  • 132

Why can't I say "He was expelled for the killing of the birds?"

You actually can say that. It isn't grammatically incorrect and it makes perfect sense. It does make it somewhat less explicit that he was the one who killed the birds, but in context that fact would still be obvious.