Skip to main content
Typos
Source Link
Django Reinhardt
  • 2.7k
  • 8
  • 35
  • 45

I am trying, and failing, to find an appropriate and succintsuccinct way of describing an individual's action in occupying a secure building to the exclusion of all others as a protest.

I could say 'he besieges himself' in the building. 'Takes-over' and 'occupies' come close, but do not really explain that he has locked everyone else, including the authorities out.

My ususalusual online sources have failed me, and I feel like there is some word or phrasing that I am missing here. Any ideas?

I am trying, and failing, to find an appropriate and succint way of describing an individual's action in occupying a secure building to the exclusion of all others as a protest.

I could say 'he besieges himself' in the building. 'Takes-over' and 'occupies' come close, but do not really explain that he has locked everyone else, including the authorities out.

My ususal online sources have failed me, and I feel like there is some word or phrasing that I am missing here. Any ideas?

I am trying, and failing, to find an appropriate and succinct way of describing an individual's action in occupying a secure building to the exclusion of all others as a protest.

I could say 'he besieges himself' in the building. 'Takes-over' and 'occupies' come close, but do not really explain that he has locked everyone else, including the authorities out.

My usual online sources have failed me, and I feel like there is some word or phrasing that I am missing here. Any ideas?

Tweeted twitter.com/StackEnglish/status/1502434373341224969
Became Hot Network Question
typo corrected
Source Link
Oliver Mason
  • 3.2k
  • 21
  • 24

I am trying, and failing, to find an appropriate and succint way of describing an individual's action in occupying a secure building to the exclusion of all others as a protest.

I could say 'he besieges himself' in the building. 'Takes-over' and 'occupies' come close, but do not really explain that he has locked everyone else, including the authroitiesauthorities out.

My ususal online sources have failed me, and I feel like there is some word or phrasing that I am missing here. Any ideas?

I am trying, and failing, to find an appropriate and succint way of describing an individual's action in occupying a secure building to the exclusion of all others as a protest.

I could say 'he besieges himself' in the building. 'Takes-over' and 'occupies' come close, but do not really explain that he has locked everyone else, including the authroities out.

My ususal online sources have failed me, and I feel like there is some word or phrasing that I am missing here. Any ideas?

I am trying, and failing, to find an appropriate and succint way of describing an individual's action in occupying a secure building to the exclusion of all others as a protest.

I could say 'he besieges himself' in the building. 'Takes-over' and 'occupies' come close, but do not really explain that he has locked everyone else, including the authorities out.

My ususal online sources have failed me, and I feel like there is some word or phrasing that I am missing here. Any ideas?

Source Link
echo3
  • 169
  • 1
  • 5

Is there an antonym for the verb 'besiege'?

I am trying, and failing, to find an appropriate and succint way of describing an individual's action in occupying a secure building to the exclusion of all others as a protest.

I could say 'he besieges himself' in the building. 'Takes-over' and 'occupies' come close, but do not really explain that he has locked everyone else, including the authroities out.

My ususal online sources have failed me, and I feel like there is some word or phrasing that I am missing here. Any ideas?