Timeline for usage of repetition in certain context
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2020 at 18:42 | comment | added | Arun kumar | I have marked it as you mentioned in the comment. | |
| Oct 6, 2020 at 18:41 | vote | accept | Arun kumar | ||
| Oct 6, 2020 at 13:04 | comment | added | BoldBen | There is a grey tick on your view of the answer. If you click on that you will accept the answer. If you don't accept an answer in that way the question will come up for review much later. | |
| Oct 5, 2020 at 15:17 | comment | added | Arun kumar | yes, I do accept it as an answer | |
| Oct 3, 2020 at 23:22 | comment | added | BoldBen | I've converted my comment into an answer, Arun. Would you like ot accept it? | |
| Oct 3, 2020 at 23:21 | answer | added | BoldBen | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 3, 2020 at 11:38 | comment | added | Arun kumar | yes, I never thought of the word recur or recurrence. | |
| Oct 2, 2020 at 22:30 | comment | added | BoldBen | You could tell them that the problem recurs every time the technicians go away having fixed it. The definition and normal use of the word recur includes the idea that the phenomenon occurs more than once so you don't need repetition. You could also start by saying you have a recurrent fault then explain that the fault recurs after the technicians leave having fixed it. | |
| Oct 2, 2020 at 19:05 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 2, 2020 at 19:17 | |||||
| Oct 2, 2020 at 19:02 | history | asked | Arun kumar | CC BY-SA 4.0 |