Timeline for Plural of "I am nobody important" i.e. "we are <nobody/nobodies> important"
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 27, 2020 at 10:48 | comment | added | Nick Gammon | By the way, mods are only supposed to step in if there is a major dispute. So the bigger question is: Will my answer incur the wrath of users of this site with enough rep to vote to close it? See A theory of moderation for more detail. "Even with active community self-regulation, moderators occasionally need to intervene". I don't expect to be jumped on by moderators, to be honest. | |
Aug 27, 2020 at 10:43 | history | edited | Nick Gammon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added another phrase.
|
Aug 27, 2020 at 10:35 | comment | added | Nick Gammon | Comments, on questions are to ask for more details about the question. Comments on answers are to ask for more details about the answers. I am attempting to answer the question. I dislike when people "answer" in a comment. I've edited my answer to add a bit of detail. The question was for an idiomatic expression. I believe this is it. "We're nobody important" mixes singular (nobody) and plural (we're). | |
Aug 27, 2020 at 10:34 | history | edited | Nick Gammon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added explanations.
|
Aug 27, 2020 at 9:48 | review | Low quality posts | |||
Aug 27, 2020 at 10:41 | |||||
Aug 27, 2020 at 9:34 | comment | added | Mari-Lou A | Fine as a comment, I guess, but you might incur the wrath of a mod or two. Can you explain (briefly, I know time is precious!) why this is the plural equivalent of "I'm nobody important"? Be aware that @herrison's answer also includes the solution “We're nobody important” | |
Aug 27, 2020 at 9:30 | history | answered | Nick Gammon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |